Paul, thanks for clearing up the requirements.
Darren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
To: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>; <iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Last Call: PIC, A Pre-IKE Credential Provisioning Protocol to
Proposed Standard
At 3:56 PM -0400 10/11/01, Darren Dukes wrote:
This may be nit-picking but I have seen no mention on IPSRA, or any
other
list, or during any meetings that there are two interoperating
independent
implementations of this draft. Is anyone able to confirm that
implementations exist and interoperate?
Yes, it is nitpicking. This call is for PIC to go to *Proposed*
Standard. The requirement for two interoperable implementations is
for going to *Draft* Standard, which is the step after Proposed
Standard. See RFC 2026 for the not-so-gory details.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium