IETF Discussion (date)
October 31, 2001
- Re: persistent domain names, RJ Atkinson, 12:10
- Re: persistent domain names, John Stracke, 08:00
- Re: persistent domain names, Michael Mealling, 07:40
- Re: persistent domain names, Michael Mealling, 07:30
- Re: persistent domain names, Michael Richardson, 07:20
October 29, 2001
- Re: censorship process?, c . c . ololo, 15:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Harald Alvestrand, 05:40
- Re: censorship process?, Harald Alvestrand, 05:10
- Re: [OF] ietf Re: in memoriam, Petr Baudis, 01:00
- Re: in memoriam, Petr Baudis, 00:50
October 27, 2001
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, justin, 21:40
- Re: IETF52 IPv6 plans, Bill Manning, 21:30
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, Bill Manning, 21:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Thomas Dineen, 20:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Perry E. Metzger, 20:40
- Re: IETF52 IPv6 plans, Perry E. Metzger, 20:30
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, Michael H. Warfield, 20:20
- censorship process?, James P. Salsman, 20:10
- Documentation for 169.254?, Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 20:00
- first my apologies... and I will only send this once..., Jeff Prodzinski, 06:50
October 26, 2001
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, RJ Auburn, 16:50
- Re: offlist Re: Two things bothering me (was Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked), grenville armitage, 14:50
- RE: offlist Re: Two things bothering me (was Re: Jim Fleming's po sting privilleges have been revoked), Lillian Komlossy, 13:50
- RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Steve Ellis, 11:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Pete Resnick, 11:40
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 11:30
- Architecture discussions?, Melinda Shore, 11:20
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 11:10
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 11:00
- Two things bothering me (was Re: Jim Fleming's posting privillege s have been revoked), Lillian Komlossy, 10:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Vernon Schryver, 10:40
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 10:30
- ROFL Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, grenville armitage, 10:00
- filtering and the purpose of mailing lists, Ofer Inbar, 09:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia, 09:40
- RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Hal Duncan, 09:30
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, bbrennan(_at_)nbn(_dot_)net, 09:20
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:10
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Pete Resnick, 09:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:50
- Fw: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia, 08:40
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Kevin Farley, 08:30
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 08:20
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 08:10
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 08:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:40
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Bruce Campbell, 07:30
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Meritt James, 07:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Brian E Carpenter, 06:50
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Johnny Eriksson, 06:40
- RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, TOMSON ERIC, 06:30
- IETF52 IPv6 plans, itojun, 06:20
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Jeffrey Altman, 06:10
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Robert Elz, 06:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 04:50
October 25, 2001
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Paul Day, 23:20
- RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Ian King, 17:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, RJ Auburn, 16:30
- RE: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Brijesh Kumar, 16:20
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, grenville armitage, 15:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Mats Dufberg, 14:00
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Ken Hornstein, 13:30
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Anthony Atkielski, 13:10
- Re: Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia, 11:50
- Jim Fleming's posting privilleges have been revoked, Harald Alvestrand, 11:20
- Re: [Enum] (no subject), Jim Fleming, 09:50
- Re: [Enum] (no subject), Jim Fleming, 06:24
- Re: [Enum] (no subject), Jim Fleming, 06:20
October 24, 2001
- Looking for Exclusive Mortgage Leads?, chilling, 19:04
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Keith Moore, 15:50
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Pekka Savola, 15:40
- RE: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Kyle Lussier, 15:30
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Anthony Atkielski, 14:40
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Joel Jaeggli, 12:10
- RE: Question about posts on this forumn, Aronson, David, 11:10
- Question about posts on this forumn, Dan Kolis, 10:50
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:10
- Internet-Drafts in PDF, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Matt Crawford, 09:50
- The IPv6 Challenge....First Ping....Ladies and Gentleman Start Your Engines...., Jim Fleming, 08:40
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Keith Moore, 08:30
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Keith Moore, 08:20
- Re: Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the meetings?, Fred Douglis, 08:10
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Colin Perkins, 08:00
- RE: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Kyle Lussier, 07:20
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Dave Crocker, 06:30
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Aaron Falk, 06:20
- TELECOM EVENTS - NOV 2001, Centre for Technology Training, 06:12
- RE: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Kyle Lussier, 05:50
- RE: Printing Internet Drafts, TOMSON ERIC, 02:50
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Francis Dupont, 02:40
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Anthony Atkielski, 02:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: A Stupid Ploy: Fwd: Who Is Bin Laden?, Mark Durham, 00:20
October 23, 2001
- Re: 3D technology? I'm afraid to ask, but I am too curious not too, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:02
- 3D technology? An interesting Teleconferencing box thing, Dan Kolis, 21:20
- Re: 3D technology? I'm afraid to ask, but I am too curious not too, Rick H Wesson, 20:40
- Re: 3D technology? I'm afraid to ask, but I am too curious not too, Ian Cooper, 20:30
- 3D technology? I'm afraid to ask, but I am too curious not too, Dan Kolis, 20:00
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:50
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:40
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Ole J. Jacobsen, 18:50
- RE: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Peter X. Zuo, 18:40
- Re: Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the meetings?, Andrew G. Malis, 18:30
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Andrew G. Malis, 18:20
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, Joel Jaeggli, 18:10
- RE: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Kyle Lussier, 17:40
- Re: Microsoft .NET Licensing, Anthony Atkielski, 16:00
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Kevin Farley, 14:30
- Re: Re: A Stupid Ploy: Fwd: Who Is Bin Laden?, Jim Fleming, 14:10
- Microsoft .NET Licensing, Kyle Lussier, 14:00
- RE: Printing Internet Drafts, Ting . Cai, 13:50
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Keith Moore, 13:40
- Re: Printing Internet Drafts, Joe Touch, 13:10
- Fwd: Re: A Stupid Ploy: Fwd: Who Is Bin Laden?, Einar Stefferud, 12:50
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Daniel Senie, 12:10
- Printing Internet Drafts, Ting . Cai, 12:00
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Jim Fleming, 11:50
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:30
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, john heasley, 11:10
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Joe Touch, 11:00
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, ned . freed, 10:50
- It all boils down to fairness., Jim Fleming, 10:10
- Re: Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the meetings?, Paul Day, 09:50
- Re: [OT] Re: Summary of recent IPv6 discussions within APNIC and RIPE, Jim Fleming, 09:40
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, Edward Lewis, 09:30
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, RJ Atkinson, 09:10
- Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the meetings ?....Re: participation in IETF meetings, Jim Fleming, 09:00
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, John Stracke, 08:50
- RE: Who Is Bin Laden?, John Stracke, 08:40
- Re: Who Is Bin Laden?, Meritt James, 08:30
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Francis Dupont, 08:20
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, Keith Moore, 08:10
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Kastenholz, Frank, 08:00
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Pete Resnick, 07:50
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, Melinda Shore, 07:40
- RE: Who Is Bin Laden?, Davenport Michael, 07:23
- Re: participation in IETF meetings, RJ Atkinson, 07:00
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, RJ Atkinson, 06:40
- Summary of feedback, process-making process, Harald Alvestrand, 06:30
- Who Is Bin Laden?, JEB, 06:25
- Re: Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, Harald Alvestrand, 02:20
October 22, 2001
- Multicast channels at the 52nd IETF, Edward Lewis, 21:10
- Re: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, Franck Martin, 19:20
- Re: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, scotty, 19:00
- Re: The International Love Bond... is this possible?, Meritt James, 09:50
- Re: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, grenville armitage, 09:40
- The International Love Bond... is this possible?, JEB, 08:50
- The International Think Tank, JEB, 08:40
- Re: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 06:10
- RE: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, TOMSON ERIC, 02:50
- Re: Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, Jiwoong Lee, 01:50
- Public warning: Please cease inappropriate posting, Harald Alvestrand, 00:30
October 19, 2001
- Re: in memoriam, Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia, 12:41
- Re: in memoriam, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:40
- Re: in memoriam, Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia, 11:20
- RE: in memoriam, Randy Bush, 11:10
- Re: in memoriam, Jim Fleming, 10:50
- RE: in memoriam, TOMSON ERIC, 10:40
- RE: in memoriam, TOMSON ERIC, 10:30
- Re: in memoriam, Jim Fleming, 10:20
- Fw: Summary of recent IPv6 discussions within APNIC and RIPE, Jim Fleming, 09:30
- 3:219 INFO, Jim Fleming, 07:00
- Re: in memoriam, Jim Fleming, 06:50
- Bleave me I am not Crazy!!!, Gaurang Pandya, 06:40
- RE: "...cast bright lights on all who would destroy freedom in th e world...", Sean Chambers, 03:30
October 18, 2001
- Re: in memoriam, Fred Baker, 14:30
- Re: about 802.1x, justin, 12:10
- Re: in memoriam, Joe Touch, 10:20
- "...cast bright lights on all who would destroy freedom in the world...", Jim Fleming, 09:10
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, Jim Fleming, 09:00
- RE: about 802.1x, TOMSON ERIC, 06:50
- R.I.P IPv4....Re: in memoriam, Jim Fleming, 06:40
- Re: [ga] Peace on Earth, NC and BC, please, Jim Fleming, 06:20
- Re: Forward value reference, Randy Presuhn, 06:10
- about 802.1x, duyong16, 05:40
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, TOMSON ERIC, 05:30
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Brian E Carpenter, 02:50
- Re: in memoriam, Einar Stefferud, 01:10
- Re: QOS [was Re: Why IPv6 is a must?], Jim Fleming, 00:30
- Executive Order - Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age, Jim Fleming, 00:10
- QOS [was Re: Why IPv6 is a must?], Brian E Carpenter, 00:00
October 17, 2001
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Jim Fleming, 23:40
- Re: Are "FULL MEMBERS"....IETF Members ?, Jim Fleming, 22:00
- Re: Are "FULL MEMBERS"....IETF Members ?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 20:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 15:00
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 12:30
- Forward value reference, chintan sheth, 12:20
- IETF is filling the rest of the space with every alternative approach, not necessarily any better..., Jim Fleming, 12:00
- Re: Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., Jim Fleming, 11:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:50
- Re: Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., Paul Ebersman, 10:40
- RE: Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., Christian Huitema, 10:30
- Re: in memoriam, Randy Bush, 09:00
- Re: Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., Jim Fleming, 07:20
- Info Reqd. in the field of RSVP !!, Ashish Gupta, 06:00
- Re: in memoriam, Toru Takahashi, 05:40
- Re: Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., Randy Bush, 05:20
- Jim Fleming, Microsoft and the american way to go..., TOMSON ERIC, 03:10
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, TOMSON ERIC, 01:20
- Re: in memoriam, Jim Fleming, 01:00
- Are IESG Members also IETF "members" ?, Jim Fleming, 00:00
October 16, 2001
- Are "FULL MEMBERS"....IETF Members ?, Jim Fleming, 23:50
- Re: in memoriam, Randy Bush, 22:00
- "Leslie has forwarded the official IETF position...Brian will take this paper to the ITU Study Group 2", Jim Fleming, 21:50
- Does the PSO have "members" ?, Jim Fleming, 21:30
- TCP/IP RFC, Bill Cunningham, 18:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Ted Hardie, 14:50
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, Einar Stefferud, 13:10
- in memoriam, Randy Bush, 12:00
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 11:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 11:30
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, ned . freed, 10:50
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, Jim Fleming, 10:20
- Re: The IETF has no members ?, Scott Bradner, 10:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Ted Hardie, 10:00
- What is the "Internet Architecture" ?, Jim Fleming, 09:50
- The IETF has no members ?, Jim Fleming, 09:20
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 09:00
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 08:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must to more detail, Brian E Carpenter, 08:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Robert Elz, 08:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must to more detail, John Stracke, 06:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Brian E Carpenter, 06:40
- Why IPv6 is a must to more detail, su bo, 04:30
- Why IPv6 is a must?, su bo, 01:20
- Why IPv6 is a must?, su bo, 01:10
October 15, 2001
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Ole J. Jacobsen, 21:30
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Randy Bush, 19:20
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 16:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 16:40
- Re: "as if the ietf was still alive!", Stephen Kent, 13:10
- "as if the ietf was still alive!", JIM R FLEMING, 12:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 10:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, grenville armitage, 10:30
- RFC-2001-10-15-000 IPv8 .INFO (3:129) Address Space Management, JIM R FLEMING, 10:20
- Re: Mailing Lists, joaquin . riverarodriguez, 10:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Brian E Carpenter, 08:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 06:40
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Dominic Pinto, 02:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Brian E Carpenter, 02:30
October 13, 2001
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Robert Elz, 20:20
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, grenville armitage, 20:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 20:00
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 19:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore, 19:30
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Ted Hardie, 19:20
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Keith Moore, 19:00
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 18:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 13:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 09:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker, 09:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 08:20
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 08:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Robert Elz, 02:34
October 12, 2001
- RE: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Ian King, 18:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker, 18:40
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, William Allen Simpson, 18:00
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Eliot Lear, 17:30
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Don McMorris Jr., 17:20
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:10
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Perry E. Metzger, 16:30
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, grenville armitage, 16:10
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Mark Durham, 13:00
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:50
- Re: PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, Neil Carpenter, 12:20
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 11:40
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Randy Bush, 11:10
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Susan Harris, 10:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin, 10:20
- PATRIOT/USA followup: ongoing House debate, William Allen Simpson, 08:50
- Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker, 08:20
- PATRIOT/USA followup: we lost in US Senate, William Allen Simpson, 08:10
- Re: Last Call: PIC, A Pre-IKE Credential Provisioning Protocol to Proposed Standard, Darren Dukes, 06:20
- Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:20
October 11, 2001
- Re: Last Call: PIC, A Pre-IKE Credential Provisioning Protocol to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 17:20
- Last Call: PIC, A Pre-IKE Credential Provisioning Protocol to Proposed Standard, Darren Dukes, 13:30
- Re: CDT Calls on Internet Activists to Urge Support for Feingold Amendments to Anti-Terrorism Bills Date: 10 Oct 2001 19:22:27 -0400, John Morris, 10:20
- Traffic Conditioning in the Internet, Mahadevan Iyer, 09:50
- CDT Calls on Internet Activists to Urge Support for Feingold Amendments to Anti-Terrorism Bills Date: 10 Oct 2001 19:22:27 -0400, William Allen Simpson, 08:00
- Changed spam filtering for the IETF list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:50
- mailing list for discussion of RDMA, allyn, 06:00
October 10, 2001
- Re: PATRIOT/USA technical problems, call to action, William Allen Simpson, 18:10
- Re: PATRIOT/USA technical problems, call to action, Fred Baker, 16:20
- Point Codes to Hexadecimal, Willis, Scott L, 13:50
- Re: ABOUT: PPP&QOS, Fred Baker, 13:20
- PATRIOT/USA technical problems, call to action, William Allen Simpson, 12:20
- RE: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND, Harald Alvestrand, 10:50
- Re: [Fwd: Specification verification tools], Olivier Dubuisson, 10:40
- Specification tools, Henning Schulzrinne, 10:30
October 05, 2001
- Re: Specification verification tools, Jiri Kuthan, 19:40
- RE: Last Call: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base for High Capacity Networks to Proposed Standard, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 19:30
- Re: Last Call: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base for High Capacity Networks to Proposed Standard, C. M. Heard, 19:10
- Re: ABOUT: PPP&QOS, xiaolee, 17:40
- Re: about: L2 VPN over MPLS, Giles Heron, 12:10
- ABOUT: PPP&QOS, xiaolee, 05:50
- Re: Specification verification tools, Bancroft Scott, 01:50
October 04, 2001
- ABOUT: PPPoE, xiaolee, 18:50
- about: L2 VPN over MPLS, xiaolee, 06:10
- FW: FW: hello see this (DRP), Willis, Scott L, 06:00
- Re: hello see this (DRP), Randy Bush, 03:00
- Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND, Franck Martin, 02:00
October 03, 2001
- Re: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND, Brian E Carpenter, 23:40
- Re: Exception to "MUST NOT", Jiwoong Lee, 17:40
- Re: Specification verification tools, Phil Griffin, 17:30
- Re: Favored Base32 Alphabet?, Alexey Melnikov, 16:00
- Re: Favored Base32 Alphabet?, Gordon Mohr, 14:00
- Re: hello see this (DRP), c . c . ololo, 13:50
- Re: Specification verification tools, Perry E. Metzger, 13:40
- RE: Specification verification tools, Francois Menard, 13:10
- hello see this (DRP), mekudi jasper, 12:50
- RE: Specification verification tools, Tim Moors, 12:00
- Re: Specification verification tools, Phil Griffin, 11:50
- Specification verification tools, Henning G. Schulzrinne, 07:40
- Re: Favored Base32 Alphabet?, Graham Klyne, 02:20