On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Anthony Atkielski wrote in reply to Paul Day:
I'm really not interested in the opinions of people
who continuously rant and spam off-topic posts and
it seems that opinion is shared by a lot of
people on the list.
That's what killfiles and filters are for.
The ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing list (IETF Discussion List) has certain
policies
set upon it. These are listed after my .signature block,
http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html and also in the 'info' that
majordomo(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org provides to you when you subscribed to the list.
Harald has acted in accordance with these policies. If you think
otherwise, please first take the trouble to read all previous posts made
or mentioning Jim Fleming on the IETF lists. The following Google links
will assist you:
Ignore any page mentioning Jim's IPv8
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=fleming+-ipv8+site%3Aietf.org
Any page mentioning IPv8
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=fleming+ipv8+site%3Aietf.org
David's Conrad summary on the individual ~3years ago.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Pre_Oct_1998/msg02068.html
Kind regards,
--
Bruce Campbell RIPE
NCC
I speak for myself, !employer
: The IETF discussion list serves two purposes. It furthers the
: development and specification of Internet technology through discussion
: of technical issues. It also hosts discussions of IETF direction,
: policy, and procedures. As this is the most general IETF mailing list,
: considerable latitude is allowed. Advertising, whether to solicit
: business or promote employment opportunities, falls well outside the
: range of acceptable topics, as do discussions of a personal nature.
:
:
: This list is meant for initial discussion only. Discussions that fall
: within the area of any working group or well established list should be
: moved to such more specific forum as soon as this is pointed out, unless
: the issue is one for which the working group needs wider input or
: direction.
: In addition to the topics noted above, appropriate postings include:
: Last Call discussions of proposed protocol actions
: Discussion of technical issues that are candidates for IETF work, but
: do not yet have an appropriate e-mail venue
: Discussion of IETF administrative policies
: Questions and clarifications concerning IETF meetings.
:
: Inappropriate postings include:
: Unsolicited bulk e-mail
: Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities,
: or technical concerns
: Unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject.
:
: The IETF Chair, the IETF Executive Director, or a sergeant-at-arms
: appointed by the Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person or
: of a thread as they deem appropriate to limit abuse. Complaints
: regarding their decisions should be referred to the IAB.