ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Exception to "MUST NOT"

2001-10-03 17:40:02
Robert,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Elz" <kre(_at_)munnari(_dot_)OZ(_dot_)AU>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: Exception to "MUST NOT"

To discover the reasons why ICMPs are sent in these cases you can
go back and look in the archives - but I don't think that was the
actual point of the original question.  More one of how to interpret
what to do in the exception cases.   From the rule containing the
exception alone you cannot - but read that with the rest of the doc
and all is clear.

Good point. If something is unclear, it's always recommendable to review the 
discussion archive and the whole document. 

However, the specification should remain as a specification, rather than a 
literature; If possible, one statement should stay clear by itself.

2 cents.
Jiwoong

kre



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Exception to "MUST NOT", Jiwoong Lee <=
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Message not available
        • Re: Exception to "MUST NOT", Robert Elz