Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF

The IETF list should be reserved for proper technical discussions, such
as the format of RFCs and Internet Drafts, NATs are good/bad/ugly, "add
me/remove me" messages, and conference location debates.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Susan Harris Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Randy Bush Message not available Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Eliot Lear <= Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Robert Elz Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, grenville armitage