Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF

though i appreciate the intent.  i would appreciate a separate mailing list
for process issues as opposed to technical stuff.  it is my job to work on
the technical stuff at some depth.  the process discussions often get a bit
too detailed <g>.

randy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Susan Harris Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Randy Bush <= Message not available Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Eliot Lear Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Robert Elz Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Dave Crocker Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, James M Galvin Re: Proposal for a revised procedure-making process for the IETF, Keith Moore