ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

BOUNCE ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org: Non-member submission from [Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>]

2001-11-02 07:40:03
From owner-ietf  Thu Nov  1 09:48:29 2001
Received: from bailey.dscga.com (bailey.dscga.com [198.78.9.11])
        by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA19767
        for <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:48:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bailey.dscga.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by bailey.dscga.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fA1EfRlc021864;
        Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from michael(_at_)localhost)
        by bailey.dscga.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id fA1EfQwk021863;
        Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:41:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:41:26 -0500
From: Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
Cc: Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>, Zefram 
<zefram(_at_)fysh(_dot_)org>,
        ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: persistent domain names
Message-ID: <20011101094126(_dot_)P12559(_at_)bailey(_dot_)dscga(_dot_)com>
Reply-To: Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>
References: <20011030211535(_dot_)A18272(_at_)fysh(_dot_)org> 
<20011031091734(_dot_)X12559(_at_)bailey(_dot_)dscga(_dot_)com> 
<60590000(_dot_)1004608453(_at_)askvoll(_dot_)hjemme(_dot_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
<60590000(_dot_)1004608453(_at_)askvoll(_dot_)hjemme(_dot_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 10:54:15AM +0100, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
--On onsdag, oktober 31, 2001 09:17:34 -0500 Michael Mealling
<michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:15:35PM +0000, Zefram wrote:
I'm looking for discussion of the problem more than the solution at this
stage; my I-D does outline a couple of possible solutions, but
considering the issues that have arisen already in respect of the
problem statement, solution finding will have to wait a bit.

BTW, If you want to use OIDs in URIs there's already RFC 3061. The only
problem is with resolution since there is no OID database and proving
who has what is not a simple operation at all...

there are a couple of databases, such as http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/

but they are NOT authoritative, WOEFULLY incomplete, and you are generally
lucky if you find what you are looking for.

it would be fun :-) to populate the oid.urn.arpa zone with data from here -
but not particularly useful, I think.

Yes it would. And if it even remotely succeeds you end up with a real
OID database that other things work off of. Once the DDDS documents
are done and the {uri|urn}.arpa delegations are created we could give it
a try.

If anyone is interested in the idea contact me directly and I'll see
how much support there is and if we could actually do something...

-MM

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Mealling        |      Vote Libertarian!       | urn:pin:1
michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net      |                              | 
http://www.neonym.net



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • BOUNCE ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org: Non-member submission from [Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>], owner-ietf <=