IETF Discussion (date)
November 30, 2001
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, David R. Conrad, 21:00
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain, 14:20
- Re: Cable modem spec(s) sites - lookie here, Ed Heffernan, 13:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 12:50
- Cable modem spec(s) sites - lookie here, Dan Kolis, 12:00
- Re: Cable modem spec., chintan sheth, 10:40
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Claus Färber, 07:20
- Re: ipngwg, please stop the insanity, Bob Hinden, 06:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, David R. Conrad, 06:40
- Cable modem spec., None, 03:50
November 29, 2001
- about radius, duyong16, 19:20
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Joe Touch, 15:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 15:20
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Aaron Falk, 14:20
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Andrew G. Malis, 14:10
- ipngwg, please stop the insanity, Zoch, Richard (TIFS), 13:40
- Re: Why is this thread alive? (was RE: Why IPv6 is a must?), grenville armitage, 13:20
- Re: Why is this thread alive? (was RE: Why IPv6 is a must?), Keith Moore, 12:50
- Why is this thread alive? (was RE: Why IPv6 is a must?), Ian King, 12:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 12:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Bill Manning, 11:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Joel Jaeggli, 11:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 11:00
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Bob Braden, 10:50
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Peter Deutsch, 10:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Bill Manning, 09:40
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Julia Finnegan, 09:30
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Charles Adams, 09:20
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Da Silva, Pedro, 08:50
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, RJ Atkinson, 08:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Steve Deering, 08:20
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Julia Finnegan, 08:10
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Howard Weiss, 08:00
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Brian E Carpenter, 07:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Meritt James, 07:40
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Pekka Savola, 07:30
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Ari Ollikainen, 07:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, johansenjr, 07:10
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Bob Hinden, 07:00
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Matt Crawford, 06:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Eric Rosen, 06:40
- No news [Re: Why IPv6 is a must?], Brian E Carpenter, 03:30
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Jeffrey Altman, 00:20
November 28, 2001
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 22:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Steve Deering, 22:00
- Re: Website password, Anthony Atkielski, 21:30
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Fred Baker, 19:00
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Tony Hansen, 18:40
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Michael H. Warfield, 17:50
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Richard Shockey, 17:30
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Tony Hain, 17:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, John Stracke, 17:10
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Charles Adams, 17:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, R.P. Aditya, 16:40
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Anthony Atkielski, 16:30
- Website password, Julia Finnegan, 16:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Anthony Atkielski, 16:10
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Anthony Atkielski, 16:00
- Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, etc, Dan Kolis, 15:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke, 15:30
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Schliesser, Benson, 15:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 15:10
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Keith Moore, 15:00
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Robert Moskowitz, 14:50
- RE: trying to reconcile two threads, Dr. Carsten Bormann, 14:40
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Daniel Senie, 14:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 14:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Eric Rosen, 14:10
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Bill Sommerfeld, 14:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Eric Rosen, 13:50
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, John Stracke, 13:40
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain, 13:30
- RE: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Gene Hastings, 13:20
- Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Alex Zinin, 13:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 13:00
- trying to reconcile two threads, Fred Baker, 12:40
- RE: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Francois D. Menard, 12:30
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Charles Adams, 12:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 12:10
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Matt Crawford, 12:00
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 11:30
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Joe Touch, 11:20
- RE: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Francois D. Menard, 10:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 10:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 10:30
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke, 10:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Eric Rosen, 10:10
- IETF PGP Key Signing Party for Salt Lake City, Theodore Ts'o, 10:00
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, John Stracke, 09:50
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, jamal, 09:40
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Keith Moore, 09:30
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Kenton Klein, 09:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Meritt James, 09:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Michael Richardson, 09:00
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Charles Adams, 08:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke, 07:50
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, John Stracke, 07:40
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Ed Gerck, 07:30
- Please welcome..., Bernard Aboba, 07:20
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Codogno Maurizio (Rozzano), 07:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 03:20
November 27, 2001
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Sandy Wills, 19:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 18:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 18:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 18:10
- Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, Anthony Atkielski, 17:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 17:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Deutsch, 16:10
- Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP, stanislav shalunov, 16:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 14:40
- Re: Last Call: Extensions to FTP to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz, 12:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Michael Richardson, 12:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 12:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Ken Hornstein, 09:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke, 07:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Michael Richardson, 07:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Michael Richardson, 06:50
- Re: Last Call: Extensions to FTP to Proposed Standard, Zefram, 06:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Aidan Williams, 06:30
November 26, 2001
- Re: v6 at Salt Lake, Joel Jaeggli, 21:50
- v6 at Salt Lake, Perry E. Metzger, 21:40
- >about 802.1x, duyong16, 19:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 19:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 18:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 18:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski, 18:20
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain, 17:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Bob Braden, 17:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 16:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Lars Eggert, 16:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 16:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Caitlin Bestler, 15:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke, 14:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 14:00
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Bruce Campbell, 13:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Caitlin Bestler, 13:40
- announcing a mailing list to discuss anonymous forwarding IDs, Scott Bradner, 12:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 09:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, ietf, 09:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Bruce Campbell, 08:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh, 07:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 06:50
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh, 06:40
November 23, 2001
- Re: example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Vernon Schryver, 14:50
- Re: example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Pete Resnick, 14:10
- Re: example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Vernon Schryver, 13:10
- Re: example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Pete Resnick, 11:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Harald Alvestrand, 01:40
- Re: example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Harald Alvestrand, 01:30
November 21, 2001
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Eliot Lear, 23:30
- example .procmailrc stuff for announce lists, Eliot Lear, 23:00
- internet-drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org is broken, ietf, 15:20
- ACTION REQUESTED: Call for nominations for IAB/IESG (1st request), Theodore Ts'o, 12:50
- about 802.1x, duyong16, 08:20
November 19, 2001
- Hello!who have the "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based on Intruder " codes?, lijianxinipsec(_at_)263(_dot_)net, 19:30
- IETF 52 and Chanuka, Robert Moskowitz, 13:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Harald Alvestrand, 09:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF list, Andy Bierman, 09:00
- RE: Splitting the IETF list, Pankaj Bhandari, 03:40
- Re: Splitting the IETF list, Brian E Carpenter, 03:20
- RE: Splitting the IETF list, GVSN Naik, 02:30
- RE: Splitting the IETF list, Pankaj Bhandari, 02:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF list, Brian E Carpenter, 01:30
- Hello!who have the "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based on Intruder " codes?, lijianxinipsec(_at_)263(_dot_)net, 00:30
November 15, 2001
- on using HTML for the ietf-internet-draft-announce-digest-list, Keith Moore, 19:30
- Re: Favored Base32 Alphabet?, Gordon Mohr, 17:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Russ Allbery, 17:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Vernon Schryver, 16:40
- Re[2]: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Gene Gaines, 15:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, John Stracke, 13:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Meritt James, 12:50
- RE: Who cares about ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....), John W Noerenberg II, 12:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Gregory Neil Shapiro, 12:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Melinda Shore, 10:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Keith Moore, 10:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Fred Douglis, 08:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Graham Klyne, 06:50
- draft-allocchio-gstn-00.txt - request for comments!, Claudio Allocchio, 06:40
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Keith Moore, 06:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Robert Elz, 01:20
November 14, 2001
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 17:00
- RE: Who cares about ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....), Jeroen Massar, 15:40
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 14:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Dave Crocker, 14:00
- Re: Favored Base32 Alphabet?, Simon Josefsson, 13:30
- Who cares about ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....), John W Noerenberg II, 13:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, John W Noerenberg II, 12:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick, 11:30
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Leslie Daigle, 10:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Michael Richardson, 10:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 09:50
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Mark Allman, 09:40
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Keith Moore, 09:20
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick, 09:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Fred Douglis, 09:00
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, RJ Atkinson, 08:40
- RE: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standar d, Graham Klyne, 07:40
- RE: ipv6 adoption...., Christian Huitema, 07:00
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, April Marine, 06:50
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Steve Deering, 01:50
November 13, 2001
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Brijesh Kumar, 18:10
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Dave Crocker, 17:50
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Dave Crocker, 17:30
- RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Ian King, 17:20
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 16:10
- Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, John Stracke, 15:50
- Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick, 15:10
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Perry E. Metzger, 14:40
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Keith Moore, 13:40
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Mike O'Dell, 13:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Keith Moore, 11:40
- RE: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standar d, Paul Skoog, 11:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:10
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Sean Doran, 09:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 08:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Erik Nordmark, 08:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Robert Elz, 04:00
- ietfCDI, Saverio Romeo, 02:30
November 12, 2001
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 18:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Joel M. Halpern, 18:10
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Perry E. Metzger, 18:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 17:50
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Dave Crocker, 17:40
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 17:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 17:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 17:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 17:00
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Sean Doran, 16:50
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Sean Doran, 16:40
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 16:30
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Keith Moore, 16:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 16:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 16:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 15:50
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 15:40
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 15:30
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Ford, 15:20
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Sean Doran, 15:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 15:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran, 14:40
- Re: ipv6 adoption...., Perry E. Metzger, 14:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 14:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Geoff Huston, 14:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 13:50
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Ford, 13:40
- ipv6 adoption...., Mike O'Dell, 13:30
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 13:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Robert Elz, 11:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 10:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 10:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 09:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 08:50
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 07:50
- Romeo Saverio, Saverio Romeo, 07:40
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 07:30
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 07:20
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, J. Noel Chiappa, 07:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore, 06:50
- Information, Salvatore Spadaro, 06:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 01:50
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Eliot Lear, 00:20
November 11, 2001
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Donald Craig, 23:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 21:10
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Randy Bush, 21:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 20:20
- RE: whois service, Martin Djernæs, 20:10
- tftp extensions archive..., Perry E. Metzger, 20:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Geoff Huston, 12:50
- Re: whois service, Harald Alvestrand, 12:00
November 10, 2001
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, pregen, 19:30
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 19:20
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving), 19:10
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 13:30
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 12:30
- Re: Difference Between Traceroute Packet and a Ping Packet, Miguel Angel Rodriguez Jodar, 08:30
- RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Propo sed Standard, Hollenbeck, Scott, 08:20
- Difference Between Traceroute Packet and a Ping Packet, Mohit Mathur, 05:10
November 09, 2001
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 20:40
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Doug Royer, 20:30
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Frank Strauss, 20:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Perry E. Metzger, 20:10
- whois service, Martin Djernaes, 20:00
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 17:20
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 16:10
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 16:00
- Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 15:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 15:10
- Re: earlier agendas, Keith Moore, 13:20
- RE: earlier agendas, Abbie Barbir, 10:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 02:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter, 02:10
November 07, 2001
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Joe Abley, 23:00
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Bill Manning, 22:30
- Re: earlier agendas, Dave Crocker, 21:30
- Re: earlier agendas, Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking, 20:40
- Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Eliot Lear, 20:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore, 18:50
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain, 13:10
November 06, 2001
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:20
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Hans Kruse, 20:00
- Re: earlier agendas, Fred Douglis, 19:50
- RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Ian King, 10:30
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh, 07:00
- Re: earlier agendas, Brian E Carpenter, 04:10
November 02, 2001
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, Bill Manning, 16:30
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, Thomas Narten, 11:50
- Re: Documentation for 169.254?, John Border, 09:30
- Re: persistent domain names, Michael Mealling, 09:10
- Re: RTSP syntax definition incomplete., Magnus Westerlund, 07:50
- BOUNCE ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org: Non-member submission from [Michael Mealling <michael(_at_)neonym(_dot_)net>], owner-ietf, 07:40
- re-routing of the path, amit gupta, 07:30
- RTSP syntax definition incomplete., Johan Gerhardsson, 06:50