ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why IPv6 is a must?

2001-11-28 14:20:04
Eric> NAT is what has prevented us from returning to the pre-1978 situation.

Keith> this is true only if you believe that [blah blah blah]

The  situation today  with NAT  is that  hosts in  separate realms  can only
communicate in 99% of the desired applications, 

to the extent this is true, it's only because the only applications 
that people become aware of, are those that can run over NAT.  many
more useful applications exist, but since they can survive only in  
less restricted environments, they aren't as well-known. 

Granted, it's  easier to  talk about the  evils of  NAT than to  explain how
billions of  new routable addresses  are going to  be added to  the existing
routing system.

if you're willing to constrain those billions of addresses to use
a single path to the net (as NAT does) then the existing routing
system does just fine.

Keith



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>