ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Why IPv6 is a must?

2001-11-29 06:40:03
from [Eric Rosen] [Permanent Link] 
Sure, in  theory one could add  zillions of new  globally routable addresses
without increasing the  size of the routing tables  in the default-free zone
at all. 

The skepticism is about whether there is (or even could be) a realistic plan
to make this happen.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  No news [Re: Why IPv6 is a must?], Brian E Carpenter
Next by Date:  Re: trying to reconcile two threads, Matt Crawford
Previous by Thread:  Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Steve Deering
Next by Thread:  Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Meritt James
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]