ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?

2001-11-13 18:10:02

Why is it a good idea? That's what mail filters are for. With filters, you
can create as many folders as you like, and treat them as separate lists.
You can even auto delete the messages that you are not interested in.

IETF Announce is just fine- it has existed for years in its current form.
Splitting the list on one complain doesn't make much sense at all, all Pete
need to do is to take help from someone who can define filters on his
system.

Cheers,

--brijesh
Corona Networks Inc.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Pete Resnick
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?


good idea.

offhand, I would make the split be between publishing 
activity and other 
announcements.

Hence, both I-Ds and RFC announcements would be on one list, 
whereas IETF 
Meeting, IETF Last call, Working Group Action announcements 
would be on the 
other.

d/

At 04:02 PM 11/13/2001 -0600, Pete Resnick wrote:
I am interested in getting all of the posts to the 
IETF-Announce list 
*except* for the greatest bulk of those posts: Internet Draft 
announcements. I find it hard to believe that I

----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464