Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?

ietf

Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?

2001-11-14 12:00:03

At 4:28 PM -0800 11/13/01, Dave Crocker wrote:

offhand, I would make the split be between publishing activity andother announcements.
Hence, both I-Ds and RFC announcements would be on one list, whereasIETF Meeting, IETF Last call, Working Group Action announcementswould be on the other.


Sounds like a good plan to me.  I would certainly find it helpful.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, April Marine Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, RJ Atkinson Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Fred Douglis Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Graham Klyne Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Dave Crocker Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, John W Noerenberg II <= Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Michael Richardson Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, John Stracke RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Ian King RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Brijesh Kumar RE: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Leslie Daigle Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Pete Resnick Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Keith Moore Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Fred Douglis Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Gregory Neil Shapiro

Previous by Date:	Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Keith Moore
Next by Date:	Who cares about ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, anyway? (was Re: ipv6 adoption....), John W Noerenberg II
Previous by Thread:	Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	Re: Splitting the IETF-Announce list?, Michael Richardson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]