RE: Why IPv6 is a must?

Noel Chiappa wrote:

I hadn't realized the registries
were trying to guard against routing table bloat as well as 
address space
exhaustion. I'm curious, when did this start, and how was it decided?


Miss a few meetings and all kinds of things start happening.... :)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, (continued) RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Charles Adams RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Schliesser, Benson Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, John Stracke RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Julia Finnegan RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Da Silva, Pedro RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Julia Finnegan Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain <= Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, David R. Conrad

Previous by Date:	Re: Cable modem spec(s) sites - lookie here, Ed Heffernan
Next by Date:	Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, David R. Conrad
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, J. Noel Chiappa
Next by Thread:	Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, David R. Conrad
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]