That depends on what you mean by 'realistic'
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Deering [mailto:deering(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:02 PM
To: erosen(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
At 8:36 AM -0500 11/29/01, Eric Rosen wrote:
Sure, in theory one could add zillions of new globally routable
addresses
without increasing the size of the routing tables in the default-free
zone
at all.
The skepticism is about whether there is (or even could be) a realistic
plan
to make this happen.
What's the realistic plan to prevent the IPv4 routing table from growing
to 2^32 route entries?
Steve