Who is going to follow the code of conduct ? People who are breaking the
code now !!! ???
I am trying to understand the intent of splitting.
-----Original Message-----
From: GVSN Naik [SMTP:gvsn(_dot_)naik(_at_)dcmtech(_dot_)co(_dot_)in]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter; Andy Bierman
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Splitting the IETF list
Andy and Brian,
Splitting IESG surely will decrease the traffic per List, but one
should aware which List handles what along with code of conduct for
each List.
thanks
Naik GVSN
Member of DCM Technologies Ltd.,
125, Udyog Vihar, Phase #5, Gurgaon 122001 INDIA
PBX: 91-124-6439224 FAX: 91-124-6439232 GSM: 91-9810492252
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter [<mailto:brian(_at_)hursley(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Andy Bierman
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Splitting the IETF list
Andy,
I don't see how this will help. The nonsense messages will still come,
from the usual sources, often copied to both lists, which will only
increase the level of annoyance.
[Splitting the -announce list doesn't have this disadvantage.]
Brian
Andy Bierman wrote:
Hi,
I would like the IESG to consider splitting this list into 2 lists.
One list for discussion of Last Call issues and another for
everything else (including minor stuff like splitting the
IETF-Announce or IETF lists :-)
thanks,
Andy