-----Original Message-----
From: Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving)
[mailto:Frank(_dot_)Dawson(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:39 PM
To: 'ext Hollenbeck, Scott'
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf-calendar(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to
Proposed Standard
So, the RFC2445 isn't "invalid per XML schema". Rather the opposite is
true.
Perhaps, but the point I was trying to make isn't about the W3C ignoring
IETF work or vice-versa. A "one size fits all" specification isn't likely
to meet everyone's needs, and the situation with 2445 and XML Schema is just
one example of a situation where the given size didn't fit someone for some
reason. The point I was trying to make is that the timestamps document
seems to provide a reasonable compromise between being too restrictive and
too permissive.
-Scott-