% >Actually, the engineering cost of building IPv6 into operating systems
% >is already essentially paid. The cost of building it into routers and the
% >like
% >is paid. The vendors are all (basically) IPv6-ready.
%
% Valdis,
%
% Your message is generally well put. However, while it is possible to send
% the packets on the wire, the fundamental underlying scaling point, the
% routing system, has not been properly addressed. Perhaps a solution can be
% retrofitted in, but then again, who knows? This, I thought, was <largely>
% the point of multi6.
%
% Eliot
Hum... I thought that multi6 was trying to figure out the ramifications
of multihomeing w/ IPv6. The issues wrt the routing system really
need to occur in a WG devoted to better routing protocols, not one
with a focus on multihoming. at least IMHO...
--
--bill