Re: Why IPv6 is a must?

I disagree with Keith on some basic assumptions.  IPv6 is not a software
upgrade in its' dominant mode.


actually, I think we do agree.  *existing* systems can migrate to IPv6 
with a software upgrade, and it's important to have a story for existing
systems.. but my guess is that the vast majority of IPv6 systems in the 
long run will not be general-purpose computers (existing or new), but 
fixed-function appliances that will ship with IPv6 built-in.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, (continued) RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Perry E. Metzger Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Brian E Carpenter Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Ian King RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Ford Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore <= Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Caitlin Bestler Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Caitlin Bestler Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Keith Moore Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Lars Eggert RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Tony Hain Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Anthony Atkielski Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Deutsch

Previous by Date:	Re: Why is IPv6 a must?, Sean Doran
Next by Date:	Re: ipv6 adoption...., Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	RE: Why IPv6 is a must?, Peter Ford
Next by Thread:	Re: Why IPv6 is a must?, Rinka Singh
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]