Nice work guys!
instead of the annoyance of one o-o-o, we've now got a thread discussing it.
Marvellous.
(and no, the irony of my reply is not lost) ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:owner-ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On
Behalf Of Manoj
Shrivastava
Sent: 21 February 2002 18:20
To: 'ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
Cc: 'bbrennan(_at_)nbn(_dot_)net'
Subject: RE: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office.
Because out-of-office responder replied to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org which is the
address of this mailing list. I also got the same message.
-----Original Message-----
From: bbrennan(_at_)nbn(_dot_)net [mailto:bbrennan(_at_)nbn(_dot_)net]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:32 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: bbrennan(_at_)nbn(_dot_)net
Subject: FW: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office.
ok, I'll bite. How did this wind up in my mailbox? NAT or fate??????
BLB
From: Carol_Bertolet(_at_)westpharma(_dot_)com
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org,
Subject: FW: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office.
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:53:50 -0500
I will be out of the office starting 02/21/2002 and will not return
until
02/25/2002.
I will be out 1/2 day Thursday afternoon and all day Friday. Please
contact MIS Customer Support for all computer issues.
Carol Bertolet