ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: S. 2048, CBDTPA (was: It's war, folks --- SSSCA formally introduced)

2002-03-26 08:20:03
Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:13:18 PST, james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)wetware(_dot_)com> 
 said:

In other words, I think it might help the U.S. Senate to know that they
won't have to wait a year for the FCC to make a "negative determination"
according to Section 3.(c), i.e. they can go directly to requiring the
vendors and users of "digital media devices" in the United States to
adopt Internet standards of its own making rather than those of the IETF.

Let's see how well Congress likes the taste of *that* medicine...

Oh, they'll love it.  You'll get a protocol designed by lobbyists for 
lobbyists.

Let's not find out.

It exists: remember that protocol suite: ISO OSI?

-- 
William Allen Simpson
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32