*>
*> * though I wish that WGs that shut down without producing a protocol
*> document would at least write up a brief RFC that explains what it
*> tried to do and why it shut down - was the problem "too hard" or
*> infeasible, was the subject too politically contentious (and what
*> were the divisive positions), were there found to be adequate
*> solutions already developed, did people lose interest, or what?
*> but sometimes even this much reporting is too difficult.
*>
*>
Strongly agree.
What we don't want to do is to measure productivity by page count or even
RFC count. Hey, I could have written the RSVP RFC as five documents;
would that be a win? I don't think so.
Bob Braden