At 3:06 PM -0500 3/25/02, Meritt James wrote:
"It's a setback for those who are eager to get IPv6 out there," says
Steve Deering, a Cisco engineer who helped design IPv6 and serves on the
IETF's Internet Architecture Board. "The Mobile IP working group has
been working on this since 1991. It's been a long process.""
And at 6:29 PM -0500 3/26/02, Meritt James wrote:
Actually, I was more interested in the quote rather than the IPv6. You
notice that the portion I extracted (which contained the quote) was NOT
the lead in, or summary article. It was a position taken by a person
that we know for for those who were not in attendance.
James,
As noted, this was from a year ago, when the Mobile IPv6 spec was sent
back to the working group to come up with a different approach to
authenticating binding updates (which they have now done). Although
the quotes are accurate, they are combined in a misleading way. The
Mobile IP group obviously has not been working on IPv6 mobility since
1991; that's (approximately) when it started working on IPv*4* mobility.
The article included several other, more serious distortions and
exaggerations of what I said (as almost always happens, as anyone who
talks to journalists knows), starting with the title. Please don't
take it as an accurate report of what really happened or what I thought
or said about it.
Steve