On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Bob Braden wrote:
According to the IANA assignment rules for RSVP values, the only two
options are IETF consensus and FCFS.
The document in question is the *CR-LDP* Extensions. I am (sadly)
aware of the RSVP assignment status.
*> If code points are to be allocated from the space to be allocated by
*> IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a *Standards Track* document be
*> written, with more detail on the messages, especially their processing.
Indeed, that is what "IETF consensus" means, isn't it?
Is it? That's good. Currently, the document is Informational, and
is being processed as such. Can this be changed?
Kireeti.