RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-

Do you think Scott Bradner could tell the editor of RFC 2026 that
someone asked precisions about 6.5.1 :-)


not with anyone watching :-)

tnx for the pointer

Scott

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), (continued) Re: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Margaret Wasserman RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner <=

RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing)