IETF Discussion (date)
April 30, 2003
- The IETF_Censored mailing list, Super-User, 20:43
- RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain, 19:12
- RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain, 17:45
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Peter Deutsch, 17:45
- RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Hesham Soliman, 17:13
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Stephen Sprunk, 16:44
- Re: site-local != NAT, S Woodside, 16:27
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:27
- Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Theodore Ts'o, 16:27
- Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Stephen Sprunk, 15:24
- RE: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Tony Hain, 15:24
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore, 15:24
- Re: site-local != NAT, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:24
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Michael Thomas, 15:24
- Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Keith Moore, 15:24
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore, 12:27
- what the "scope" disagreement is about, Ofer Inbar, 12:26
- RE: site-local != NAT, Margaret Wasserman, 12:21
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Michael Thomas, 11:45
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 11:27
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore, 11:24
- RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain, 10:55
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Daniel Senie, 10:43
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 10:31
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Keith Moore, 10:12
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:11
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Michael Thomas, 10:00
- RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain, 09:59
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk, 09:54
- Re: site-local != NAT, John C Klensin, 08:51
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Keith Moore, 08:46
- Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas, 07:58
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 07:58
- Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush, 07:53
- Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush, 07:53
- Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas, 07:43
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 07:29
- Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas, 07:16
- Re: A simple question, Michael Thomas, 07:04
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), John Kristoff, 06:56
- Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush, 06:41
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:58
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:50
April 29, 2003
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 21:47
- Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas, 21:31
- Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore, 20:13
- RE: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Tony Hain, 19:27
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), J. Noel Chiappa, 19:13
- Re: A simple question, Mark . Andrews, 19:10
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Stephen Sprunk, 18:28
- RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain, 18:24
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk, 18:18
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), S Woodside, 17:43
- Re: policy domains, Eliot Lear, 17:43
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk, 17:33
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk, 16:59
- Re: policy domains, Stephen Sprunk, 16:46
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Peter Deutsch, 16:41
- site-local != NAT, Ofer Inbar, 15:56
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), John Kristoff, 15:44
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day, John Stracke, 15:32
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day, Joe Abley, 15:06
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day, Peter Deutsch, 15:06
- Re: A simple question, Matt Crawford, 14:30
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), John C Klensin, 14:28
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:23
- Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day, John Stracke, 13:43
- Re: [MailServer Notification]To recipient: Message matched eManager setting and action was taken., Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:18
- Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Dean Anderson, 13:18
- A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Peter Deutsch, 12:08
- Re: A simple question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:22
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Dean Anderson, 10:18
- Re: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:08
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, John Stracke, 10:08
- IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), John C Klensin, 10:08
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Daniel Senie, 09:45
- Re: A simple question, Matt Crawford, 09:23
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, John Stracke, 08:46
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, MC, 08:19
- Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman, 08:00
- Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt, 07:21
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Paul Vixie, 07:21
- Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt, 07:21
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, John C Klensin, 07:21
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Arien Vijn, 07:10
- Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman, 07:10
- Re: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Brian E Carpenter, 07:10
- Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman, 07:10
- Re: A simple question, Bill Manning, 07:05
- Re: A follow up question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:01
- Re: A simple question, David Conrad, 07:01
- policy domains, S Woodside, 06:43
- Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman, 06:42
- Re: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand, 06:30
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 06:27
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 06:24
- Re: A simple question, Eliot Lear, 06:24
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore, 06:22
- Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Jason Hunt, 06:22
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 06:22
April 25, 2003
- Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt, 21:06
- RE: Patents and IETF, Christian Huitema, 13:26
- RE: Patents and IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:50
- RE: Patents and IETF, Tony Hain, 09:35
- Re: Patents and IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:43
April 24, 2003
- Patents and IETF, Tulip Rasputin, 23:51
- RE: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, john . loughney, 21:01
- RE: A follow up question, john . loughney, 21:01
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 15:44
- Re: A follow up question, Tim Chown, 15:40
- Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens, 15:38
- TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand, 15:38
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 15:30
- Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear, 15:27
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 15:13
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 15:12
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 15:04
- RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain, 15:03
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 15:02
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 15:02
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 14:29
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 14:11
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Eliot Lear, 14:06
- Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear, 13:59
- RE: A follow up question, Daniel Senie, 13:52
- Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens, 13:07
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 12:59
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 12:59
- RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain, 12:59
- Re: question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt, Keith Moore, 12:17
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 11:15
- Re: question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt, J. Noel Chiappa, 09:31
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:31
- Re: question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt, Keith Moore, 08:42
- Re: question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt, Eliot Lear, 08:20
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Eric Rosen, 08:06
- Re: A simple question, Terry Gray, 05:59
- Re: A simple question, Ignatios Souvatzis, 05:59
- question about draft-irtf-nsrg-report-09.txt, Ronald van der Pol, 05:54
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Zefram, 03:26
April 23, 2003
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 21:25
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 21:25
- Re: A follow up question, John C Klensin, 20:25
- Re: A follow up question, John C Klensin, 19:59
- RE: A follow up question, John C Klensin, 19:59
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 19:14
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Stephen Sprunk, 18:54
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 18:33
- Re: A follow up question, Dave Crocker, 17:45
- Please try again, anthony, 17:17
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 17:04
- Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk, 16:41
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 16:40
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 16:35
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Stephen Sprunk, 16:28
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 16:00
- Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk, 15:59
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 15:56
- RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain, 15:55
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 15:14
- Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore, 15:09
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore, 15:06
- Re: A follow up question, David Conrad, 14:03
- Re: A simple question, Spencer Dawkins, 14:03
- Re: A follow up question, S Woodside, 13:53
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 13:00
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 12:31
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 12:31
- RE: A follow up question, John C Klensin, 12:31
- RE: A follow up question, Daniel Senie, 11:37
- RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain, 10:18
- Re: A simple question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:56
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:56
- Re: A follow up question, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:44
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Stracke, 08:28
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Jeffrey Race, 08:04
- RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain, 08:04
- A follow up question, Tony Hain, 07:44
- Re: A simple question, Spencer Dawkins, 05:33
- Re: A simple question, Pekka Savola, 03:01
- Re: A simple question, Tim Chown, 01:48
- Re: A simple question, S Woodside, 00:22
April 22, 2003
- Re: A simple question, Pekka Savola, 22:36
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 20:19
- Re: A simple question, David Morris, 16:44
- Re: A simple question, Spencer Dawkins, 16:11
- Re: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Alex Zinin, 13:16
- Re: A simple question, Rob Austein, 12:22
- Re: A simple question, Paul Vixie, 11:43
- Re: A simple question, Dean Anderson, 11:04
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 10:53
- Re: A simple question, Paul Vixie, 10:18
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Bob Natale, 10:13
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Spencer Dawkins, 07:09
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 06:43
- Re: A simple question, Randall Stewart, 06:11
- Re: A simple question, Fred L. Templin, 06:11
- Re: A simple question, Randall Stewart, 06:07
- Re: A simple question, Terry Gray, 06:05
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Dave Crocker, 06:05
- Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Bob Natale, 06:05
- Re: STRN (was Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?), Chris Newman, 05:59
- Re: A simple question, Joe Abley, 05:59
- Re: A simple question, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:38
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Aronson, 04:24
- Re: A simple question, Pekka Savola, 03:58
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 02:13
- RE: A simple question, john . loughney, 00:46
April 21, 2003
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:36
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Scott W Brim, 19:32
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Vernon Schryver, 18:37
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin, 17:40
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:35
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 17:18
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker, 17:15
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Morris, 16:50
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Vernon Schryver, 16:46
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker, 16:02
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 15:48
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley, 15:47
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 15:46
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Bill Manning, 15:46
- Availability of recorded IETF 56 sessions..., Joel Jaeggli, 15:33
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley, 15:28
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John Morris, 15:14
- Re: A simple question, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 14:53
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Ross Finlayson, 14:51
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:24
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 14:24
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Ole J. Jacobsen, 13:55
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin, 13:48
- Re: A simple question, Leif Johansson, 13:38
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 12:17
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 12:05
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, John C Klensin, 12:05
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:10
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Randy Presuhn, 10:28
- Re: A simple question, John C Klensin, 04:40
April 20, 2003
- Re: A simple question, S Woodside, 22:22
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 19:20
- Re: A simple question, Daniel Senie, 17:25
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 13:28
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker, 13:05
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 13:02
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 12:58
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 12:57
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 12:35
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 12:13
- Re: A simple question, Richard Carlson, 11:57
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Randy Presuhn, 11:53
- Re: A simple question, Daniel Senie, 11:25
- Re: A simple question, Richard Carlson, 10:10
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 10:10
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 08:43
- Re: A simple question, Markku Savela, 08:33
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 07:22
- Re: A simple question, Eliot Lear, 07:01
- Re: A simple question, S Woodside, 00:15
April 19, 2003
- Re: A simple question, Paul Vixie, 21:58
- Re: A simple question, Bill Manning, 21:33
- Re: A simple question, john heasley, 20:31
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 18:09
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 17:42
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 17:40
- Re: A simple question, Bill Manning, 17:35
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 17:30
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 17:25
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 17:25
- Re: A simple question, Ole Troan, 17:18
- Re: A simple question, Joe Abley, 17:13
- Re: A simple question, Joe Abley, 17:07
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 17:04
- Architectural Considerations section in specs, Dave Crocker, 16:59
- Re: A simple question, Dave Crocker, 16:59
- Re: A simple question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:52
- Re: A simple question, Peter Deutsch, 16:33
- Re: A simple question, Ole Troan, 16:32
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 16:32
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 16:21
- Re: A simple question, Bob Braden, 16:21
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 15:52
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 15:50
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 15:50
- Re: A simple question, Vernon Schryver, 15:43
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 15:43
- Re: A simple question, Daniel Senie, 15:40
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 15:34
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 15:30
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 15:30
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 15:21
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 15:08
- Re: A simple question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:59
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 14:46
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 14:46
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 14:46
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 14:38
- Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk, 14:37
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 14:35
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 14:34
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 14:05
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 13:52
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 13:41
- Re: A simple question, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:28
- Re: A simple question, Keith Moore, 12:20
- Re: A simple question, Robert Elz, 11:50
- Re: A simple question, Dave Crocker, 07:19
- Re: A simple question, Mark Prior, 03:42
April 18, 2003
- Re: A simple question, Dave Crocker, 17:15
- Re: STRN (was Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?), Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 16:59
- RE: A simple question, Tony Hain, 16:57
- Re: A simple question, Dave Crocker, 16:36
- A simple question, Tony Hain, 15:19
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Spencer Dawkins, 09:31
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Dave Crocker, 07:06
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Spencer Dawkins, 06:24
April 17, 2003
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Joe Abley, 23:02
- Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Russ Allbery, 23:00
- Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 22:45
- RE: MPLS Support for DiffServ, Shahram Davari, 10:06
- MPLS Support for DiffServ, VILLARREAL, STEVE (SBC-MSI), 09:13
April 11, 2003
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 20:23
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 20:23
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 17:40
- NOSHADE CLASS, internet-drafts, 16:40
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 14:21
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 14:16
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 13:56
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 13:52
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 13:48
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 13:43
- RE: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 13:43
- RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py, 12:42
- Re: RFC 2418, RFC 2026 and the Tony Hain appeal (was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Scott Bradner, 12:42
- I-D ACTION:draft-iesg-charter-02.txt (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:54
April 09, 2003
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:19
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, John Stracke, 13:56
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:43
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, Peering, 13:28
- RE: BGP Black hole Community, Rasheeduddin, Tariq, 13:28
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, Joe Abley, 09:07
- Re: BGP Black hole Community, Peering, 06:59
April 04, 2003
- Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Dean Anderson, 15:35
- Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Dean Anderson, 15:06
- Re: A plea for calm, Dean Anderson, 07:57
- Re: A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Carsten Bormann, 05:41
- Re: A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Spencer Dawkins, 05:40
- A modertor for the IETF list? (Re: A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:37
- Re: Chastisement (A plea for calm), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:37
April 03, 2003
- Re: A plea for calm, Carsten Bormann, 14:58
- Re: v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Eric Rosen, 13:47
- Re: v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Steven M. Bellovin, 13:02
- v6 support (was Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))), Keith Moore, 10:03
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 08:51
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 08:02
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 06:23
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 05:50
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman, 05:50
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 05:17
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Fredrik Nyman, 04:00
- A plea for calm, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:16
April 02, 2003
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 16:14
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 16:11
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 16:09
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 15:57
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Rob Austein, 15:56
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Brian Zill, 15:56
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, John Stracke, 15:56
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 13:19
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 12:46
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 12:00
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 10:55
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Daniel Senie, 10:13
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 10:12
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Randy Bush, 10:09
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 10:07
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 10:04
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 09:56
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 09:41
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 09:41
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 09:34
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 09:27
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning, 09:20
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 08:23
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 06:30
- Re: addresses in referrals (Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses), Keith Moore, 06:19
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Spencer Dawkins, 06:19
- Re: Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), John C Klensin, 06:00
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 04:25
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:50
- Re: Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), Pekka Savola, 00:00
April 01, 2003
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Pekka Savola, 23:53
- addresses in referrals (Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:44
- Evolution in action (Re: Thinking differently), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:36
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michael Richardson, 20:43
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 17:20
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Eric A. Hall, 16:30
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa, 16:20
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 15:04
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 15:04
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa, 14:33
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Eliot Lear, 14:17
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 13:55
- Re: Thinking differently, Randy Bush, 13:34
- RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Fleischman, Eric, 13:13
- Re: Thinking differently, Bill Manning, 13:05
- Re: Thinking differently, Jaap Akkerhuis, 12:56
- RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, J. Noel Chiappa, 12:54
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning, 12:37
- Re: Thinking differently, Bill Manning, 12:30
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 12:26
- RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain, 11:40
- draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt, Simon Josefsson, 09:46
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 09:29
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker, 09:26
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker, 09:26
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Keith Moore, 09:19
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Paul Vixie, 08:49
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), J. Noel Chiappa, 08:44
- The IETF_Censored mailing list, Super-User, 08:44
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), J. Noel Chiappa, 08:44
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 08:35
- RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain, 08:19
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 08:08
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 08:08
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:18