Re: A follow up question

On Saturday, Apr 26, 2003, at 20:11 US/Pacific, james woodyatt wrote:

[...] Let me be clear: if I find myself porting all my IPv4 ALG's towork in an IPv6 NAT, I will-- without any hesitatation-- go StarkFleming Mad. I may take some of you with me with me.

Apologies for the typographical errors. And I should have written"Flaming" not "Fleming"-- that was an unintentional slip on my part.Please forgive me.



--
j h woodyatt <jhw(_at_)wetware(_dot_)com>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: A follow up question, (continued) Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt <= Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk RE: A follow up question, John C Klensin RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain RE: A follow up question, Daniel Senie Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear Re: A follow up question, Tim Chown Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore

Previous by Date:	Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Paul Vixie
Next by Date:	Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman
Previous by Thread:	Re: A follow up question, james woodyatt
Next by Thread:	Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]