In message <005701c3076d$6d626320$7f1afea9(_at_)oemcomputer>, "Randy Presuhn"
writes
:
Hi -
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer_dawkins(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: Internet Draft Guidelines Require Precise Formatting?
...
For Internet-Drafts, page-breaks are not required.
...
If this is true, when can we expect
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt
to be updated to reflect this change?
Page breaks are highly desirable for I-Ds, because it makes it easier
for people to print them out. They're much less necessary when things
are moving to the RFC stage, because the RFC editor is going to strip
all the formatting from the I-D and start from there.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)