RE: A follow up question

Hi Tim,

> > How about starting with the IPng archives?!  They're actually more 
> > persistant than, say, an internet draft, anyway.
> No need to bother, just read any sample of 100 ipng emails in one day and
> the same arguments come up again and again.  And again.
Just to second this - and its a process guestion (wait, there is another
working group focused on that ...) - I thought that, at the end of the 
day, we are supposed to be making standards, not mailing list
archives ....

John