Re: site-local != NAT

The address *is* a valid identifier in the IP architecture.

Er, um, well of an interface maybe. But what you
really want is a host identifier, which is the source
of lots of trouble...


want != have

and keith is trying to focus on the pragmatic reality

randy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
site-local != NAT, Ofer Inbar RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush <= Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, S Woodside