Re: site-local != NAT

Well, the pragmatic reality is to avoid using IP
addresses as substitutes for endpoint
identitifiers. Or maybe that's not pragmatic, but
tough noogies; using IP addresses as endpoint
identifiers is sloppy and generally a bad idea.


...and at this point the argument repeats, without your having acquired
any additional clue.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
site-local != NAT, Ofer Inbar RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore <= Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas Re: site-local != NAT, Randy Bush Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore Re: site-local != NAT, S Woodside RE: site-local != NAT, Tony Hain what the "scope" disagreement is about, Ofer Inbar

Previous by Date:	Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas
Next by Date:	Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas
Previous by Thread:	Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas
Next by Thread:	Re: site-local != NAT, Michael Thomas
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]