Steve> I can't get upset about Microsoft declining to ship poorly-tested
Steve> code. Given how many security holes are due to buggy, poorly-tested
Steve> programs, I applaud anyone who takes that seriously.
Well, suppose they were to ship IPv6 without IPsec, on the grounds that they
didn't have the testing resources for IPsec. Would you still be applauding
them? Or would you be questioning whether they have their priorities right?
Features always fall off due to the inability to allocate sufficient testing
resources, but a vendor does have some choice over which features those
are.