Re: A follow up question

Folks,

I would like to strongly encourage everyone to recast this discussion
from the perspective of the Senie/Klensin postings.  They are cogent,
coherent and constructive.  They even smack of serious architecture.

And that is more than most of the rest of this thread can claim.

d/
--
 Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
 Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
 Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: A follow up question, (continued) Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: A follow up question, S Woodside Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, John C Klensin Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore Re: A follow up question, Dave Crocker <= TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk Re: A simple question, Bob Braden Re: A simple question, Peter Deutsch Re: A simple question, Joe Abley Re: A simple question, S Woodside RE: A simple question, john . loughney Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk

Previous by Date:	Please try again, anthony
Next by Date:	Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]