RE: spam

i'm wasting my time because i want this problem looked
at more broadly.


Are you in agreement with what Noel wrote earlier WRT involving some
money in sending email is the only deterrent that spammers that pollute
our inbox and now our mailing list would understand?

Michel.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: spam, (continued) Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, Dean Anderson Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski RE: spam, Avi Lior Re: spam, Dominic Pinto Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski RE: spam, Rod . Walsh RE: spam, Avi Lior RE: spam, Avi Lior Re: spam, Andrew Shore RE: spam, Michel Py <= Re: spam, Paul Vixie Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, J. Noel Chiappa Re: spam, Dean Anderson RE: spam, Christian Huitema RE: spam, Michel Py RE: spam, Fam. van den Berg RE: spam, John C Klensin RE: spam, Bob Hinden RE: spam, Tony Hain

Previous by Date:	Re: spam, vinton g. cerf
Next by Date:	Re: spam, Russ Allbery
Previous by Thread:	Re: spam, Andrew Shore
Next by Thread:	Re: spam, Paul Vixie
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]