Hi,
What is a 'radical anti-spammer'?
----------
This is the _false_ assertion of
radical anti-spammers, who seem to me to be the abusers. Chris Neill
(antispammer open relay abuser eventually fired from Verio--he was
ironically, an abuse admin) was shocked to learn he was't anonymous, like
he thought.
The claims made by antispammers about open relays are false. Type 1
spammers seem to get that, judging by their behavior. But radical
antispammers don't.
--Dean
On Wed, 28 May 2003, John Stracke wrote:
Dean Anderson wrote:
We are lucky that spammers don't get a discount
Open relays give them a five-finger discount.
--
/===============================================================\
|John Stracke |jstracke(_at_)centive(_dot_)com |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com |
|Centive |My opinions are my own. |
|===============================================================|
|"Power corrupts; Powerpoint corrupts absolutely." -- Vint Cerf |
\===============================================================/