Re: spam

John writes:

> Many places in the world do not have access to
> broadband. For many, receiving spam is both a
> monetary expense & a time expense.
What percentage of their bandwidth is consumed by spam, and is this
bandwidth fully utilized?

> Also, when the ratio of spam vs. valid mail become
> high, the utility of email shrinks.
But when spam filters throw away legitimate e-mail, the utility of e-mail
shrinks even further.