while the spam discussion has been entertaining as usual, for those who
Not particularly entertaining for me.
- There is a proper forum for discussing anti-spam proposals. It is the
mailing list of the IRTF antispam research group,
asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_)
This proposal fits within their taxonomy of antispam solutions
<http://www.irtf.org/asrg/survey_of_proposals.htm>, and the discussion is
therefore appropriate to that forum. Consult the ASRG charter and web pages
for guidelines for appropriate discussion.
Will do. Thank you. As I said previously, I started here:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/inet-standards.html
And here:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/editor-info.html
Which recommend going through IEFT.
- The charter of the IETF discussion list says that "unprofessional
commentary" is inappropriate for the list. While it can certainly be
entertaining to watch people try to define each other as kooks of various
kinds, it is also definitely unprofessional commentary.
Agreed 100%! Wish you would have said that earlier to the person who started
the "Kook" thread.
So is drawing conclusions in public about other people's intelligence,
education and previous epxerience.
Which was the whole point of making a "Kook" thread to try to discredit my post
or using the words "<plonk>" to address my serious post.
Summary: Please move over, folks - wrong arena!
As I said, "I'll believe that when I see more engineering posts than I see
posts in the Kook thread" or ones addresses my posts with the word "plonk".
Professionalism is I think one of the words I used to <rant> about what was
happening.
I will move over now to IRTF and expect to go through this whole nasty
reception thing all over again. Yippie! :)
Shelby Moore
http://AntiViotic.com