IETF Discussion (date)
September 24, 2003
- Molecular Equipment, NM Research, 23:12
- Re: Please restrict your posting volume, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 20:58
- Re: Please restrict your posting volume, Dean Anderson, 19:31
- Re: Please restrict your posting volume, Dean Anderson, 17:31
- Please restrict your posting volume, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:18
- RE: conclusion for ALL YOUR WILDCARDS, vinton g. cerf, 06:19
- RE: conclusion for ALL YOUR WILDCARDS, Laird, James, 06:05
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 05:13
- Re: conclusion for ALL YOUR WILDCARDS, Masataka Ohta, 04:59
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 02:51
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Laird, James, 00:49
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 00:32
September 23, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 23:45
- RE: conclusion for ALL YOUR WILDCARDS, Laird, James, 22:24
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Laird, James, 22:23
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:17
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:47
- conclusion for ALL YOUR WILDCARDS, Keith Moore, 21:29
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:19
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 20:49
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 20:13
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Laird, James, 19:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 18:16
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 18:14
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tim Chown, 17:24
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 17:11
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 14:24
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 12:22
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 12:17
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 12:06
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 11:52
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 11:37
- Verisign problems - redirection without RR's, how did it come to be?, Dan Kolis, 11:05
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 10:17
- Re: Verisign problems - redirection without RR's, Marc Schneiders, 10:17
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., jfcm, 08:45
- Re: How can I get more advice for my I-D?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:15
- Re: Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, Anthony Atkielski, 07:59
- Re: Verisign problems - redirection without RR's, Anthony Atkielski, 07:59
- Verisign problems - redirection without RR's, Dan Kolis, 06:36
- Re: Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell, 04:52
- Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (fwd), Anthony Atkielski, 03:47
- How can I get more advice for my I-D?, wang liang, 02:13
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dr. Jeffrey Race, 01:16
September 22, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 22:56
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith, 20:54
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Laird, James, 19:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 19:37
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 19:12
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 19:12
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Laird, James, 18:44
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 18:20
- Re: Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, Anthony Atkielski, 18:15
- Re: ICANN asks VeriSign to pull redirect service (fwd), Dean Anderson, 18:15
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith, 17:55
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith, 17:55
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 17:32
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., John C Klensin, 17:32
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 16:04
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Russ Allbery, 15:58
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 15:19
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 14:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 14:30
- Re: Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:49
- Re: Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, John C Klensin, 10:37
- Proposal to charge for commercial use of ISO country codes?, Graham Klyne, 03:19
September 21, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 17:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:26
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith, 14:18
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 13:27
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 13:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 13:25
September 20, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 18:55
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Eric A. Hall, 18:53
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Larry Smith, 18:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski, 18:10
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 17:48
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 17:20
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 17:10
- Re: Verisign: All Your ... (fwd), Dean Anderson, 17:08
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:46
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 16:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 16:26
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 16:23
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., John C Klensin, 13:28
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 10:12
- [no subject], Stanley Weilnau, 09:45
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 05:45
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tim Chown, 03:19
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 01:18
September 19, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., hardie, 21:33
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:32
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Simon Leinen, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Neal McBurnett, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., hardie, 21:31
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], bill, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., grenville armitage, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Dean Anderson, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Anthony Atkielski, 21:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:28
- IAB Architectural statement on the use of wildcards in the DNS, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 21:24
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., bill, 21:23
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 21:19
September 18, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 10:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 10:30
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 09:48
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 09:43
- Hurricane Isabel and ietf.org, sweilnau, 09:41
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 09:39
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:39
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:29
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Hoffman / IMC, 09:23
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 09:16
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Peter Sylvester, 09:16
- Hurricane Isabel and ietf.org, sweilnau, 09:00
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 08:58
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bill Manning, 08:58
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 08:54
- E-Commerce implications [Re: Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To US], Steve Neruda, 08:14
- Re: typo wildcard I-D, Zefram, 07:52
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Francis Dupont, 05:22
September 17, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Masataka Ohta, 22:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 21:49
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Masataka Ohta, 21:45
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bill Manning, 21:39
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 19:50
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 19:01
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Tom Lord, 18:03
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Florian Weimer, 16:56
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., bill, 16:50
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., william, 16:03
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 15:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 15:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Carl Malamud, 14:34
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Doug Royer, 14:29
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 14:21
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 13:47
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], bill, 13:05
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Gream, Matthew, 07:09
September 16, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bill Manning, 22:21
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie, 22:21
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:29
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 21:10
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie, 19:45
- RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Sabharwal, Atul, 15:07
- Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Masataka Ohta, 15:05
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Jaap Akkerhuis, 14:44
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Rick Wesson, 14:34
- typo wildcard I-D, Zefram, 14:25
- ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee response to Verisign "SiteFinder", Gene Gaines, 14:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], David Morris, 14:12
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin, 13:46
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Paul Vixie, 13:46
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 13:34
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 13:21
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski, 13:17
- Re: TLD Managers and Wildcard Ethics, Keith Moore, 13:04
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:49
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Vernon Schryver, 12:43
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin, 12:29
- Re: TLD Managers and Wildcard Ethics, Michael StJohns, 11:41
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis, 11:27
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis, 11:27
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., David Morris, 10:24
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 10:21
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Keith Moore, 10:02
- Re: TLD Managers and Wildcard Ethics, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich, 09:42
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 09:40
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 09:38
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Michael Richardson, 09:36
- Re: TLD Managers and Wildcard Ethics, Michael StJohns, 09:35
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich, 09:21
- TLD Managers and Wildcard Ethics, dbotham, 09:16
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell, 08:53
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bruce Campbell, 08:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin, 08:32
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin, 08:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Vernon Schryver, 08:12
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Dean Anderson, 08:11
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski, 08:11
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Anthony Atkielski, 08:06
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:56
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 07:55
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Bill Sommerfeld, 07:43
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] 7. Best Practices - Service Providers & MTA Authors (was: Fwd: Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's)], Dean Anderson, 07:42
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 07:37
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Bruce Campbell, 07:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], James M Galvin, 07:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], grenville armitage, 07:14
- Fwd: Verisign attempt to "take" all unpaid addresses, Gene Gaines, 07:12
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ..., Edward Lewis, 07:11
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Spencer Dawkins, 06:45
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 06:31
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Zefram, 06:23
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Dean Anderson, 06:10
- [Fwd: [Asrg] 7. Best Practices - Service Providers & MTA Authors (was: Fwd: Verisign's New Change and Outdate RBL's)], Yakov Shafranovich, 05:50
- Re: Developing software for IETF/IRTF groups, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:27
- Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Jari Arkko, 05:19
- Re: Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Randall R. Stewart (home), 05:14
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore, 05:14
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker, 05:14
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 05:03
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:06
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Karl Auerbach, 03:28
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Florian Weimer, 03:25
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Zefram, 03:06
- Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Florian Weimer, 02:45
September 15, 2003
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Tim Chown, 23:37
- Re: Stupid DNS tricks, Masataka Ohta, 23:37
- Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), Yakov Shafranovich, 23:04
- Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:57
- Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), Yakov Shafranovich, 22:36
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Keith Moore, 21:51
- Re: What *are* they smoking? (fwd), Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:48
- Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Neal McBurnett, 21:40
- Stupid DNS tricks, Adam Roach, 21:38
- [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your Misspelling Are Belong To Us], Yakov Shafranovich, 21:16
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 11:46
- Developing software for IETF/IRTF groups, Yakov Shafranovich, 11:32
- Spoofing and SCTP ADD-IP (was Re: Solving the right problems ...), Pekka Nikander, 10:53
- Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:37
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:23
- Re: Re: [Megaco] A question about H.248 on SCTP, zhou . zichun, 07:11
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home), 07:09
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home), 07:08
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home), 07:07
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker, 07:05
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home), 07:05
- Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm, 05:11
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:36
September 14, 2003
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore, 22:25
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:40
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 20:40
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore, 20:40
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 19:00
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Dean Anderson, 18:49
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dr. Jeffrey Race, 18:47
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:09
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin, 17:49
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Shelby Moore, 17:48
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin, 17:34
- Re: Careful with those spamtools....., Dean Anderson, 16:28
- Skill page for classroom use., vcerf, 13:26
September 13, 2003
- RE: Careful with those spamtools....., Michel Py, 20:04
- Careful with those spamtools....., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 17:26
- Shannon Entropy, channel protocols, and propensity for noise, Shelby Moore, 16:18
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf, 07:16
September 12, 2003
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:48
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Dean Anderson, 18:19
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin, 17:23
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore, 14:54
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Keith Moore, 14:10
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randall R. Stewart (home), 12:35
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:59
- Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore, 06:23
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 06:20
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 06:19
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 06:18
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Edward Lewis, 06:17
- Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore, 00:43
September 11, 2003
- No censorship (Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:54
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Bill Manning, 22:30
- Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore, 22:23
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Joel Jaeggli, 20:25
- RE: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, MDX Technologies Inc., 20:24
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Fritz F. Saad, 20:13
- Re: Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:08
- Re: Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:54
- Proposal to use DNS as public key repository, Sergey Babkin, 19:35
- Re: Multiple Address Service for Transport (MAST), Randy Bush, 17:27
- Exposing the security holes in all existing anti-spam techniques (was Re: You Might...), Shelby Moore, 17:07
- Re: weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:04
- Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Bob Braden, 09:13
- Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Dave Farber, 08:49
- Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Joe Touch, 08:25
September 10, 2003
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver, 12:31
- Re: how to get a filename for ID?, Jari Arkko, 12:31
- Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Cyrus Daboo, 12:31
- Re: how to get a filename for ID?, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 04:20
- how to get a filename for ID?, wang liang, 00:54
September 09, 2003
- Re: literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Bob Hinden, 17:05
- literature review [ was: blah blah blah ], Randy Bush, 16:29
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:22
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage, 16:12
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm, 15:51
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 15:50
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:46
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:20
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:17
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins, 15:10
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:59
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:35
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins, 14:35
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:24
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:17
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Einar Stefferud, 11:59
- Re: POP3 extensions - thanks, Russ Allbery, 11:56
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm, 11:08
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:08
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 10:52
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Colin Perkins, 10:52
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Doug Royer, 10:25
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Jim Sermersheim, 10:12
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Vernon Schryver, 10:07
- Re: Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Doug Royer, 09:52
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:38
- Re: POP3 extensions - thanks, Joel Jaeggli, 09:24
- POP3 extensions - thanks, Dan Kolis, 08:56
- Re: POP3 has no EHLO! (yup). There is no POP4, Pete Resnick, 08:21
- Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Alexey Melnikov, 06:37
- weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm, 06:35
- POP SMTP etc extensions, Dan Kolis, 06:22
- POP3 has no EHLO! (yup). There is no POP4, Dan Kolis, 06:19
- weemail (was Proposal to define a simple architecture ...), jfcm, 04:42
- Spammers using IETF meeting attendance lists, Graham Klyne, 02:01
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore, 00:17
September 08, 2003
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:55
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore, 23:36
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore, 20:48
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 20:20
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 19:56
- Re: The proper forum for evaluation of Spam proposals, Shelby Moore, 19:14
- The proper forum for evaluation of Spam proposals, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:41
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta, 15:20
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 13:58
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 13:44
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:37
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 12:13
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 11:31
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 11:29
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 10:47
- Re: POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, John C Klensin, 10:25
- POP3 prograsm that enforce old message policies, Dan Kolis, 10:12
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 10:09
- POP3 delivers, not deletes III, Dan Kolis, 10:06
- Re: your mail, Paul Vixie, 10:06
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Randy Bush, 09:42
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, John C Klensin, 09:36
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:33
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:30
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 08:56
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Randy Bush, 08:03
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver, 07:45
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 07:45
- Re: POP3 delivers, not deletes, Shelby Moore, 07:25
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., grenville armitage, 07:09
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 07:06
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., grenville armitage, 06:53
- POP3 delivers, not deletes, Dan Kolis, 06:28
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 05:09
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 04:52
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Sandy Wills, 04:40
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 04:07
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 03:57
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:39
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Zefram, 02:19
- A roadmap for end-point identifiers? (was Re: where the indirection layer belongs), Pekka Nikander, 01:58
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander, 01:37
- Re: your mail, Pekka Savola, 00:14
September 07, 2003
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 22:37
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver, 22:05
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:43
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 19:11
- Re: You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Shelby Moore, 18:21
- [no subject], Randy Bush, 18:01
- [no subject], shogunx, 17:55
- You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If ..., Vernon Schryver, 17:41
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 17:29
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 17:17
- Re: How to create ID in Windows system?, Scott W Brim, 16:56
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx, 16:56
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Keith Moore, 16:38
- Re: How to create ID in Windows system?, Bob Braden, 16:08
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 16:07
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:54
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:41
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Johnny Eriksson, 15:29
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:05
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 15:05
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:43
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), John C Klensin, 14:41
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 14:21
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), vinton g. cerf, 14:15
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Johnny Eriksson, 14:15
- RE: How to create ID in Windows system?, Haas, Chris, 14:15
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:55
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 13:55
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta, 13:35
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson, 12:55
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx, 12:50
- How to create ID in Windows system?, wang liang, 10:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Keith Moore, 10:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage, 10:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 01:43
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 00:51
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 00:51
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 00:51
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 00:12
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 00:12
September 06, 2003
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx, 23:52
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Vernon Schryver, 23:51
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx, 23:41
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 23:31
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiatelegitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), grenville armitage, 23:01
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:48
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:47
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 22:33
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 22:27
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), shogunx, 22:27
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 21:59
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 21:57
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 21:45
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), John C Klensin, 21:41
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:39
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:27
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 21:19
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 21:06
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:50
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:15
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 19:38
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 19:29
- Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:08
- Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore, 06:07
September 05, 2003
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Masataka Ohta, 17:47
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Dave Crocker, 16:10
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:55
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Spencer Dawkins, 14:22
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 13:50
- network management!!, Shoaib Khan, 13:28
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 11:18
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:52
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig, 01:28
September 04, 2003
- Re: Re: My details, wsimpson, 23:05
- Re: Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Bill Manning, 21:45
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, wang liang, 20:45
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 19:08
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin, 16:54
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 16:21
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 16:13
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Pete Resnick, 15:53
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 15:29
- Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Vinod Vasudevan, 14:15
- Input to Proceedings for the 57th IETF Meeting, Rebecca Bunch, 14:12
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:20
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 11:34
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Melinda Shore, 10:59
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas, 10:48
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Melinda Shore, 10:27
- Portable voice services with switching between urban and home, Dan Kolis, 10:20
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas, 10:09
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 08:15
- Draft on 97.0.0.0. network, Vinod Vasudevan, 08:10
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Greg Cunningham, 08:10
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Ole J. Jacobsen, 07:51
- Fw: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:27
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Bob Natale, 07:27
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 07:27
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:50
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, grenville armitage, 00:40
- ASON and OBS Performance, Syed Murtaza Haider Bilgrami, 00:30
September 03, 2003
- Re: names, addresses, routes, Pekka Nikander, 23:54
- Re: names, addresses, routes, Masataka Ohta, 20:56
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Steve Conner, 20:18
- Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Masataka Ohta, 18:25
- Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Masataka Ohta, 17:45
- Re: names, addresses, routes, Dave Crocker, 17:00
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 15:57
- Re: names, addresses, routes, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:34
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin, 15:32
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 14:42
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, S Woodside, 13:08
- RE: names, addresses, routes, Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar \(UMKC-Student\), 13:08
- Re: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), S Woodside, 12:58
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Dean Anderson, 12:45
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 12:45
- RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Randy Bush, 12:35
- RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Robert . Shaw, 12:21
- Re: names, addresses, routes, Pekka Nikander, 12:10
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Thomas, 11:56
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, John C Klensin, 11:33
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson, 11:33
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 11:08
- RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Christian de Larrinaga, 11:05
- [Fwd: Where to start?], Sheri Salami, 10:46
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed, 10:46
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Doug Royer, 10:38
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:34
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:32
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:31
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:31
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 10:28
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Marshall Rose, 10:28
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:26
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 10:25
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Marshall Rose, 10:25
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf, 10:25
- names, addresses, routes, Dave Crocker, 08:42
- RE: VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Robert . Shaw, 08:21
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig, 07:44
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 07:32
- VoIP regulation... Japan versus USA approaches (RE: Masataka Ohta, Simon), Dan Kolis, 07:16
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Masataka Ohta, 06:22
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Vernon Schryver, 06:22
- RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich, 06:04
- RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich, 05:43
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jean-Jacques Puig, 04:53
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Andrew Newton, 04:50
- RE: the VoIP Paradox, john . loughney, 03:56
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg {VE6BBM}, 03:41
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jari Arkko, 03:20
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg, 02:33
September 02, 2003
- RE: Solving the right problems ..., Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB), 23:47
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander, 23:14
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Jari Arkko, 22:40
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix, 22:04
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., shogunx, 21:55
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix, 21:43
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Randy Bush, 21:34
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., USPhoenix, 21:20
- Re: Details, agenda, 20:28
- A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, wang liang, 19:53
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 18:46
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 18:19
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson, 18:19
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, ned . freed, 17:18
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Richard Shockey, 17:15
- Re: Virus alert, Jonathan Hogg, 16:10
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Masataka Ohta, 15:46
- Re: Virus alert, Dean Anderson, 14:55
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:55
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 14:50
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson, 14:36
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed, 14:19
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Kireeti Kompella, 13:53
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Lyndon Nerenberg, 13:11
- Well, Marketing maybe (SIP, etc), Dan Kolis, 13:11
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Bill Strahm, 13:11
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Scott Bradner, 12:52
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 12:49
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Michael Richardson, 12:43
- VoIP whatever, Michael Thomas, 12:43
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Dave Crocker, 12:34
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 12:06
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Thomas, 11:59
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander, 11:50
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, ned . freed, 11:50
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Scott Bradner, 11:50
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:24
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:23
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Pekka Nikander, 11:22
- Multimedia presentation services like (ugh) VoIP, Dan Kolis, 11:19
- RE: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michel Py, 11:19
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Zefram, 11:19
- RE: Solving the right problems ..., Henry Sinnreich, 11:03
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Eliot Lear, 10:56
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 10:41
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 09:22
- Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Michael Richardson, 09:16
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Melinda Shore, 09:08
- Re: FW: Virus alert, Einar Stefferud, 08:51
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Dave Crocker, 08:51
- Re: FW: Virus alert, Einar Stefferud, 08:51
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, J. Noel Chiappa, 08:43
- RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Michel Py, 08:41
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, vinton g. cerf, 08:40
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Spencer Dawkins, 08:26
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:21
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:02
- RE: Solving the right problems ..., vinton g. cerf, 08:02
- A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml, Rosen, Brian, 07:59
- VoIP whatever, Dan Kolis, 07:41
- RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB), 07:38
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 07:17
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 07:10
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 07:09
- Re: where the indirection layer belongs, Robert Honore, 07:09
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 07:08
- RE: the VoIP Paradox, Rod . Walsh, 02:54
- Re: Virus alert, Jonathan Hogg, 02:38
- Re: the VoIP Paradox, grenville armitage, 02:31
September 01, 2003
- the VoIP Paradox, S Woodside, 22:16
- Re: FW: Virus alert, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:38
- Re: FW: Virus alert, shogunx, 20:35
- Re: FW: Virus alert, Dean Anderson, 20:35
- Re: Solving the right problems ..., Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 20:18
- RE: where the indirection layer belongs, Yuri Ismailov (KI/EAB), 20:18