Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimat

Note that advertising is inappropriate on the IETF mailing list.

--On 10. september 2003 05:21 +0800 Shelby Moore <coolpage(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>wrote:

If we comparing solutions to viral attachments (that also do anti-spam),
ours operates after the MTA but before (statistically) the MUA, and is
instantly user configurable:

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), (continued) Message not available Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Vernon Schryver Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Harald Tveit Alvestrand <= Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Dean Anderson Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Bill Strahm Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Spencer Dawkins Message not available Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE), Shelby Moore

Re: Proposal to define a simple architecture to differentiate legitimate bulk email from Spam (UBE)