On 10/27/03 at 6:42 PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
RB> Even though, given IDNA now exists as a proposed standard, the main
RB> issues relate to the local part, the issue under discussion is that of
RB> internationalized mail addresses, not just internationalized
RB> local-parts.
Really? What work needs to be done, except for local part? IDNA takes care
of the right-hand side.
Please review John Klensin's draft before making these kinds of assumptions.
RB> Restricting the disucssion to local-parts runs the risk of excluding
RB> other potentially relevent issues.
I agree. Limiting discussion at this point to local-part does not
take into account some of the possibilities.
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://wwww.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102