ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: national security

2003-12-03 01:38:37
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On onsdag, dec 3, 2003, at 04:12 Europe/Stockholm, Franck Martin wrote:

ITU is worried like hell, because the Internet is a process that 
escapes the Telcos. The telcos in most of our world are in fact 
governments and governments/ITU are saying dealing with country names 
is a thing of national sovereignty. What they most of the time fail to 
see, is that most registry are willing to hand it over to the 
governments provided they DO understand the issues, and not use DNS to 
empower telcos in more exclusive licencing power.

ITU has been also misleading countries by making them think that DNS 
issues will be solved at ITU meetings. I have been telling countries 
that they must attend ICANN meetings and no other one. When this 
happens, US corporations will have less power over ICANN and things 
will be better.

I agree and realize this. However, the let's take that argument out in 
the open and not hide it behind "national security". The countries I 
have worked with, do have national disaster plans that can handle a IP 
network completely cut off from the rest of the world. But those plans 
are made together with the industry, as today you can not have this 
type of planning without co-operation of the large, world wide 
companies. Even if the governments own and control many of the telcos 
of the world, the operation of the sub-sea cables that transport the 
traffic is mostly run by organizations they have no control over.

Best regards,

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP82dC6arNKXTPFCVEQIqZQCcDd1ffRAvtfBjvUSJXfoaw1ilVkQAnRqH
V/3ZsmgatgorFVGQYmDmXLcM
=yrRB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>