RE: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet)

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
These protocols require that at least one
side in each transfer is capable of
receiving inbound sessions.


This is not true. Kaaza does not require to open any ports nor configure
anything in the NAT box. The latest versions of SIP using STUN don't
either.

Michel.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), (continued) Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Dean Anderson Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Keith Moore Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Dean Anderson Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Keith Moore Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Dean Anderson Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Mark Smith Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Iljitsch van Beijnum Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Dean Anderson Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Joe Abley RE: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), jfcm RE: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Michel Py <= Re: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Mark Smith RE: dubious assumptions about IPv6 (was death of the Internet), Michel Py