Re: How Not To Filter Spam

Vernon Schryver wrote:
> If a complete stranger is the sender of an incoming message, then
> crypto keys are irrelevant to determining the message is unsolicited
> bulk.  
No. In PGP, for example, I accept a key based on who signed it and
when. If I can trust the signer(s), I may use a key from a stranger.

> The PGP mantra that a good key does not imply that the sender or the
> message is good applies here.
Define "good key" and you'll define what the key is good for.