James M. Polk wrote:
I agree it is related. Perhaps the pidf-lo document should only
reference the civil doc for the chart? In other words, have the civil ID
be the creator of the chart, and not have it in both documents (fearing
inconsistency), but have the pidf-lo document reference *to* the chart
in the civil doc.
I know this is not necessarily optimal, but this is the last week to
catch this before IETF LC in the pidf-lo doc is completed, so there is
time to address it now.
Given that both need to define different tags (XML element names in one
case, numeric tags in the other), I think such reference would be
difficult, even leaving timing issues aside. I think we can handle the
synchronization of the documents - the list of elements is small.
Henning
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf