I agree completely with Bob. I want to point out one issue where
vigilance will be important:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 12:39:53PM -0700, Bob Hinden allegedly wrote:
Housing the IETF administrative activity in ISOC seems to me to be a
much simpler solution to our administrative problems and will require
much less work to get it set up. I am concerned that the independent
approach will take considerably more cycles and work from the IETF
leadership to get it set up and functioning. This will take away from
working on what I consider to be more important problems.
I agree in principle but part of what got us into this situation was the
feeling that we could just let ISOC (and/or CNRI) just take care of the
non-technical details. Let's avoid even leaning that way this time.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf