IETF Discussion (date)
September 30, 2004
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 18:21
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 18:10
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 17:52
- Re: Complaint on personal attack by John Brown, Dean Anderson, 17:40
- Complaint on personal attack by John Brown, Dean Anderson, 17:32
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 17:19
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:29
- RE: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 12:24
- Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Randy Presuhn, 11:34
- RE: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Thomas Gal, 10:23
- RE: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Joe Shen, 10:06
- Submitted comments from the poll about restructuring options, Henrik Levkowetz, 09:47
- Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:36
- Poll results (raw), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:35
- (no subject), deva, 04:05
- Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), Dave Crocker, 02:23
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Leif Johansson, 02:12
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where, Gene Gaines, 01:04
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker, 00:49
September 29, 2004
- Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Paul Vixie, 23:45
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Brian E Carpenter, 23:39
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Leif Johansson, 23:04
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker, 20:03
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Richard Shockey, 18:40
- [tcpsat] test - please ignore, Aaron Falk, 17:36
- Re: Boilerplates and xml2rfc, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:19
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:16
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:14
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where, Kai Henningsen, 15:49
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Kai Henningsen, 15:48
- Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson, 15:47
- Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Doo Timbir, 02:40
- Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Doo Timbir, 02:33
September 28, 2004
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:13
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Joe Touch, 15:53
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Joe Touch, 15:16
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, avri, 11:30
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Bill Manning, 11:09
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, ned . freed, 10:56
- Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Lars Eggert, 10:34
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker, 09:55
- NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Danny McPherson, 09:26
- Boilerplates and xml2rfc, Tim Chown, 09:21
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 08:42
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Eliot Lear, 08:18
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Margaret Wasserman, 07:50
- Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:13
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Eliot Lear, 05:46
- Re: Thoughts on scenario O, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:19
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:14
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, John C Klensin, 04:37
- Thoughts on scenario O, Adrian Farrel, 04:03
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:18
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:45
September 27, 2004
- Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker, 16:12
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie, 14:39
- My opinion on administrative restructuring: Scenario O, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki), 14:34
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain, 12:45
- Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), David Lloyd-Jones, 12:32
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie, 11:42
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain, 11:34
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie, 11:20
- RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain, 11:10
- Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:53
- RE: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (beha ve) (fwd), Eric Burger, 09:44
- Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), John Loughney, 08:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 08:48
- Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Jeroen Massar, 08:24
- Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 08:05
- Re: a note about the scenarios, Tim Chown, 06:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Francis Dupont, 03:35
September 26, 2004
- Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 19:48
- i wants to leave this mail list, Thank you, taoyuan, 19:27
- I would like to join in the discussion mail list. thanks., zhaisuping, 18:57
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Christian de Larrinaga, 14:56
- Re: An Organized Activity of the ISOC [resent], shogunx, 13:20
- An Organized Activity of the ISOC [resent], Kurt D. Zeilenga, 11:56
- Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie, 11:11
September 25, 2004
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Erik Huizer, 15:36
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Scott W Brim, 14:14
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Vernon Schryver, 06:43
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Noel Chiappa, 05:57
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Erik Huizer, 05:06
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Scott W Brim, 04:07
- ISOC [Re: My views on the Scenario O & C], Brian E Carpenter, 02:43
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Leif Johansson, 02:27
September 24, 2004
- Re: a note about the scenarios, Fred Templin, 19:25
- Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Sam Hartman, 17:07
- Re: a note about the scenarios, Joe Touch, 16:15
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner, 13:51
- Re: a note about the scenarios, John C Klensin, 13:45
- Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, Henrik Levkowetz, 13:42
- My views on the Scenario O & C, Bob Hinden, 13:26
- Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, John C Klensin, 12:51
- Re: future meetings, Marcia Beaulieu, 12:39
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 12:08
- Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, Ole Jacobsen, 10:06
- Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, avri, 09:44
- Re: a note about the scenarios, Tim Chown, 09:10
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?, graham . travers, 09:04
- Poll: Restructuring questions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:26
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 08:15
- Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Spencer Dawkins, 04:36
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB), 01:11
September 23, 2004
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?, Tony Hain, 22:25
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Tony Hain, 22:21
- a note about the scenarios, John Loughney, 21:11
- future meetings, Michael Richardson, 20:40
- Scenario C (was: Scenario O), Kai Henningsen, 15:35
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Kai Henningsen, 15:26
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Joel M. Halpern, 14:33
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner, 14:13
- Scenario C or Scenario O ?, Sally Floyd, 13:56
- RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 13:54
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson, 12:29
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Vernon Schryver, 11:21
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola, 10:48
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson, 10:14
- Re: Layer Violation (on the reorganization process), John C Klensin, 10:07
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 09:34
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner, 09:29
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin, 09:22
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin, 09:20
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:17
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman, 09:02
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 08:58
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Joel M. Halpern, 08:42
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 08:35
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman, 08:28
- Layer Violation (on the reorganization process), Olaf M. Kolkman, 08:07
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Joel M. Halpern, 07:53
- re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner, 07:01
- Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Margaret Wasserman, 06:53
- Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 02:59
- Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Alexandru Petrescu, 02:52
- RE: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on w here from here), Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 02:18
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Tony Hain, 01:16
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Brian E Carpenter, 01:02
September 22, 2004
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Gene Gaines, 16:57
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Karl Auerbach, 15:00
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Gene Gaines, 14:38
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Sam Hartman, 13:37
- Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Doo Timbir, 13:14
- Re: IETF 62, Ted Faber, 10:18
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Karl Auerbach, 09:44
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 08:12
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin, 08:06
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin, 08:01
- FYI - US Government requesting information on E-Mail Authentication, Richard Shockey, 07:54
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter, 07:49
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites, scott bradner, 06:19
- Tax excemption (Re: Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:10
- RE: Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:43
- Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:42
- Re: IETF 62, Michael D Frisch, 05:27
September 21, 2004
- Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin, 22:02
- RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), dee3, 20:30
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner, 18:43
- Re: IETF 62, Scott Michel, 18:28
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner, 17:37
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Erik Huizer, 14:34
- NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers: Second Call, Danny McPherson, 14:11
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Ted Hardie, 11:09
- RE: Things that I think obvious...., Tony Hain, 08:46
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman, 06:26
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Scott W Brim, 05:40
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin, 05:28
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter, 04:34
- Re: Things that I think obvious...., Fred Baker, 04:23
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:14
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola, 04:06
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:12
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter, 02:23
September 20, 2004
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Jonathan Rosenberg, 21:31
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), John C Klensin, 19:30
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson, 18:19
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Melinda Shore, 16:18
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Bob Hinden, 15:47
- RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 15:10
- Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Leslie Daigle, 14:34
- RE: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (beha ve) (fwd), Peterson, Jon, 14:32
- RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), Robin Uyeshiro, 14:28
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:55
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Jonathan Rosenberg, 12:52
- AdminRest Scenario C: An IETF Administrative Support Foundation a s an Independent Nonprofit Corporation, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 12:30
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson, 12:01
- Re: IETF 62, Michael Richardson, 11:57
- Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby, 10:00
- Re: IETF 62, jamal, 09:47
- Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby, 09:42
- Re: IETF 62, Tim Chown, 09:31
- Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby, 09:03
- Re: IETF 62, jamal, 08:15
- Re: IETF 62, shogunx, 07:19
- Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Hadmut Danisch, 07:16
- Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Leslie Daigle, 06:45
- Re: IETF 62, Melinda Shore, 06:34
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Mark Allman, 06:10
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:01
- Re: IETF 62, jamal, 05:25
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Brian E Carpenter, 05:11
- Re: IETF 62, Lars Eggert, 04:53
- Re: IETF 62, John C Klensin, 04:06
- Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby, 02:42
September 19, 2004
- Re: IETF 62, Lars Eggert, 23:57
- Re: IETF 62, Martin Stiemerling, 23:39
- Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola, 22:43
- Re: IETF 62, Greg Daley, 20:17
- Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby, 17:49
- Re: IETF 62, Sam Hartman, 17:30
September 17, 2004
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Dick St.Peters, 10:55
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Henrik Levkowetz, 03:22
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Hadmut Danisch, 02:04
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), william(at)elan.net, 01:58
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Tim Chown, 01:27
September 16, 2004
- Just test, please ignore, Benny Nasution, 23:54
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Michael Richardson, 14:03
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Michael Richardson, 14:01
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, avri, 08:44
- Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:02
- RE: help needed about TCP/IP and SNMP, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:52
- Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Brian E Carpenter, 05:39
- help needed about TCP/IP and SNMP, akshar kanak, 04:03
September 15, 2004
- Re: Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:57
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin, 14:55
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Carl Malamud, 12:26
- Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, John C Klensin, 12:04
- ISOC board meeting comes AFTER IETF meeting this time, Steve Crocker, 11:53
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin, 10:51
- Re: Things that I think obvious...., Margaret Wasserman, 10:06
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, John C Klensin, 09:51
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Carl Malamud, 07:26
- Re: Things that I think obvious...., Margaret Wasserman, 06:38
- Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), shogunx, 06:24
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:59
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:07
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Brian E Carpenter, 02:35
- IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Spencer Dawkins, 02:25
- Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Brian E Carpenter, 02:20
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen, 01:02
- Technical work and the definition of the IETF (Re: Things that I think obvious....), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:57
September 14, 2004
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner, 20:03
- Re: Things that I think obvious...., John C Klensin, 19:53
- Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Aaron Falk, 18:16
- IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin, 14:47
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, Bill Manning, 14:35
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Vernon Schryver, 10:09
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Joel Jaeggli, 09:39
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Scott W Brim, 09:27
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Steve Crocker, 09:02
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Eric Rosen, 08:14
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Steve Crocker, 06:40
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki), 06:29
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, James Kempf, 05:58
- Re: Functional differentiation, John C Klensin, 04:14
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner, 02:33
- Re: Functional differentiation, Brian E Carpenter, 02:23
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), graham . travers, 01:17
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), graham . travers, 01:05
September 13, 2004
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, Bill Manning, 21:59
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz, 19:57
- Re: Functional differentiation, April Marine, 16:58
- Re: There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Lynn St.Amour, 16:41
- re: I-D submission tool draft, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:33
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Ole Jacobsen, 15:30
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bob Braden, 14:44
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen, 13:07
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Theodore Ts'o, 12:53
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Dave Crocker, 11:53
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Carl Malamud, 11:31
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), John C Klensin, 09:48
- Re: Functional differentiation, Brian E Carpenter, 08:22
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Brian E Carpenter, 08:08
- Re: I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz, 07:48
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz, 06:25
- re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner, 05:54
- I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz, 05:22
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:33
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:09
September 12, 2004
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Dave Crocker, 21:45
- Re: What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...)), avri, 21:08
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), John C Klensin, 18:29
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 17:50
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 15:36
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore, 15:18
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 15:14
- What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:08
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore, 15:01
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 13:19
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian Huitema, 12:29
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Carl Malamud, 12:06
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 11:45
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 10:48
- RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Steve Crocker, 09:53
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), John C Klensin, 09:22
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Margaret Wasserman, 09:14
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), scott bradner, 07:33
- Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:22
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen, 07:16
September 11, 2004
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 18:30
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 17:58
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 17:44
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud, 16:54
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., John C Klensin, 16:16
- first steps (was The other parts of the report...), scott bradner, 14:19
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 14:17
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 14:14
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian Huitema, 14:10
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud, 13:58
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 13:50
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Ole Jacobsen, 13:26
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud, 12:09
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 05:32
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Spencer Dawkins, 05:00
September 10, 2004
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Pekka Savola, 22:33
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:34
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 16:06
- Software tools for IETF -- suggestions?, Henrik Levkowetz, 15:04
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 14:25
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud, 12:49
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 12:44
- Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 26, simon . dux, 12:34
- Looping address on the IETF list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:28
- Any interrupt on 'movement' in OPNET?, Atekeh Maghsoudlou, 12:06
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 12:04
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 12:03
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 11:52
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 11:50
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 11:43
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 11:39
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch, 10:21
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 10:16
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning, 10:10
- Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25, simon . dux, 09:59
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian de Larrinaga, 09:56
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Scott W Brim, 08:49
- Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 24, simon . dux, 08:28
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 08:03
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 07:54
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Stewart Bryant, 07:44
- Re: Things that I think obvious..., Bernard Aboba, 07:39
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian de Larrinaga, 07:31
- Re: the other parts of the report, Bernard Aboba, 07:28
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), John C Klensin, 07:27
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore, 07:18
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), scott bradner, 06:57
- Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 23, simon . dux, 06:48
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 06:45
- Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Scott W Brim, 06:43
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:28
- admin director (was The other parts of the report..), scott bradner, 05:53
- archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner, 05:42
- An oversight function - composition thereof?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:45
- The other parts of the report...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:39
- Re: Where to discuss a draft?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:25
September 09, 2004
- Re: Functional differentiation, scott bradner, 17:31
- Re: Functional differentiation, Ted Hardie, 17:03
- meeting planning, Michael Richardson, 15:48
- Where to discuss a draft?, Luis Oliveira, 12:22
- Re: Functional differentiation, Bernard Aboba, 04:38
- Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:33
- help needed about TCi/IP, akshar kanak, 01:44
September 08, 2004
- Re: National network harmonization efforts?, Aaron Falk, 21:18
- Re: There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Margaret Wasserman, 15:49
- There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Pete Resnick, 15:14
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Lynn St.Amour, 14:41
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Pete Resnick, 11:35
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], scott bradner, 11:12
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Pete Resnick, 10:46
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Ted Hardie, 09:39
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin, 08:29
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, avri, 07:06
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin, 06:51
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:25
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:12
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], John C Klensin, 06:09
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, avri, 05:56
- National network harmonization efforts?, Erik Huizer, 05:24
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, scott bradner, 04:28
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Brian E Carpenter, 01:48
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Brian E Carpenter, 01:35
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Erik Huizer, 00:38
September 07, 2004
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Fred Baker, 23:38
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:16
- RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:09
- Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin, 22:37
- (no subject), Anjan Biswas, 22:31
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Fred Baker, 20:29
- Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Ted Hardie, 19:06
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, scott bradner, 17:25
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Margaret Wasserman, 17:19
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's, Paul Vixie, 17:05
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Steve Crocker, 16:45
- RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Thomas Gal, 16:08
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Geoff Huston, 15:52
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Leslie Daigle, 15:33
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Leslie Daigle, 15:32
- RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Thomas Gal, 15:05
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Sam Hartman, 14:44
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Aaron Falk, 11:55
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Carl Malamud, 11:48
- Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 11:30
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Paul Vixie, 11:14
- request for ICAR reviewers, Mark Allman, 10:25
- RE: Reviewing: draft-malamud-consultant-report-00.txt, Thomas Gal, 10:23
- Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], scott bradner, 09:01
- Reviewing: draft-malamud-consultant-report-00.txt, Graham Klyne, 08:50
- RE: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], graham . travers, 08:49
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Sam Hartman, 08:37
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], scott bradner, 07:42
- Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Pete Resnick, 07:30
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Margaret Wasserman, 06:54
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, avri, 06:27
- Sergeants-at-arms for the IETF list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:51
September 06, 2004
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter, 23:20
- Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Brian E Carpenter, 23:16
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Pete Resnick, 19:41
- RE: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Thomas Gal, 17:29
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, John C Klensin, 14:02
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, John C Klensin, 13:51
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 13:37
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Carl Malamud, 13:32
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:57
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, John C Klensin, 09:18
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, avri, 08:23
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Margaret Wasserman, 07:27
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter, 06:27
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, graham . travers, 06:08
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Eliot Lear, 05:56
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Margaret Wasserman, 05:44
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, graham . travers, 04:34
- Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Brian E Carpenter, 02:32
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 01:55
- On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:51
September 04, 2004
- help needed about SNMP, akshar kanak, 22:45
- Re: How IETF treats contributors, grenville armitage, 11:45
- Legal umbrella etc (Re: What to incorporate), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:13
- Budget numbers (Re: What to incorporate), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:06
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Dean Anderson, 01:25
September 03, 2004
- Re: How IETF treats contributors, ned . freed, 23:11
- Re: How IETF treats contributors, Nathaniel Borenstein, 19:51
- Core Problems/First Principles (was: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Margaret Wasserman, 19:27
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Steve Crocker, 19:21
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 15:19
- NomCom 2004/05 Call for Volunteers, Danny McPherson, 14:38
- A different cut [was Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Leslie Daigle, 14:05
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), avri, 09:00
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, scott bradner, 05:57
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Adrian Farrel, 05:33
- POLL: IETFs Sunday-Friday or Thursday-Tuesday, Henrik Levkowetz, 03:08
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henrik Levkowetz, 01:05
September 02, 2004
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), scott bradner, 11:13
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:01
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Dean Anderson, 10:55
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Michael Richardson, 10:51
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Leslie Daigle, 10:46
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Fred Baker, 09:37
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC), 08:33
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Susan Harris, 07:55
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Susan Harris, 07:47
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Carl Malamud, 07:35
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Carl Malamud, 07:20
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Melinda Shore, 07:11
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC), 07:05
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Susan Harris, 06:46
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Melinda Shore, 05:50
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson, 04:49
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Scott Bradner, 04:38
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Stig Venaas, 04:34
- Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Brian E Carpenter, 04:27
- RE: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Christian de Larrinaga, 04:09
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson, 04:03
- RE: Friday @ IETF61?, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 03:53
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:47
- What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:40
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson, 03:26
- Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter, 03:19
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Jari Arkko, 02:55
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Tim Chown, 02:00
September 01, 2004
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-josefsson-dns-url-09.txt, Simon Josefsson, 17:50
- Re: Bad mailing list practice?, David Frascone, 15:21
- Bad mailing list practice?, Cyrus Daboo, 14:23
- Re: How IETF treats contributors, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:14
- Re: How IETF treats contributors, william(at)elan.net, 09:51
- RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:48
- Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:20