Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Christian Huitema wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> > [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf
> Of
>
> > Joe Touch
> > Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:42 AM
> > To: Kai Henningsen
> > Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> > Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
> >
> >
> >
> > Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Joe,
>
> You mention a potential chilling effect an authors if the IETF
> maintained an archive of past drafts, but the text in RFC 2026 is pretty
> clear. Check the paragraph #1 in section 10.3.1. It says "the
> contributor ... grant an unlimited perpetual, non-exclusive,
> royalty-free, world-wide right and license to the ISOC and the IETF
> under any copyrights in the contribution." Note the words "unlimited
> perpetual" -- definitely not "limited to 6 months". 
>
> -- Christian Huitema 
It's still unclear - the document contains required wording about its 
expiration, under the same document. The two statements are in conflict 
in that regard.
Joe

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf