This has been a rathole every time we've tried to discuss the issues on the
IETF list.... among other things because nobody's written a draft that
tries to cover the issues... at least we need to cover:
- whether all people at all times have committed to letting the IETF
publish their drafts in perpetuity, or only for 6 months
- whether, if that's doubtful, we have to obtain their explicit permission
or can rely on "we'll publish, tell us if you didn't want it"
- how we should formulate the rule change (if it is a rule change) that
permits us to do the "eternal publishing" going forwad, and how we should
make sure people know that
do you really want to take another round around that topic today?
agree that the potaroo.net site is close-to-ideal, once we decide that we
can do this.....
Harald
--On fredag, september 10, 2004 08:36:37 -0400 scott bradner
<sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu> wrote:
fwiw - I would like to see a public archive of old IDs
something like
http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/html/xids-curr.html
would be ideal (imo)
I also think that there needs to be a concentrated effort to bring the
mailing list archives up to date on the IETF web site (part of that is
to retrieve the old archives for lists which have not been run from
ietf.org)
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf