On Monday, September 13, 2004 08:38:45 -0400 scott bradner
<sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu> wrote:
I will say that I'm not fond of the idea of requiring that WG chairs
pre-approve the submission of -00 WG IDs, as a WG chair I'd rather be
able to enforce me getting a chance to review the document first - I'm
fine with letting a WG chair be able to pre approve but I do not think
it should be the only way that the process should be able to work
I agree. While both submission of the document and approval by the chair
are necessary, there's no reason to require a particular order. If I'm not
available to approve a new document (say, because I'm on a train returning
from an IETF meeting), the system should wait until I can deal. It should
_not_ force the submitter to wait -- computers are much better at waiting
than people are.
-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+(_at_)cmu(_dot_)edu>
Sr. Research Systems Programmer
School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf