I think that this (scenario 0) is the right approach to follow. It appears
to me to be the lowest risk path consistent with the needs that have been
Two minor comments:
1) The references to "the IASF bank account" should probably be relaxed to
"IASF fund accounts" or "IASF accounts". As written, it presumes that
there is exactly one bank account, and that separation of funds is by bank
control. While the later is probably a good idea, I don't think this BCP
is the place to call that out. And the exact number of bank accounts used
by IASF (0, 1, 5, or ...) is not a concern for this BCP.
2) The schedule calls for seating the IAOC on January 15, and hiring the
IAD by the end of January. Given that the search committee can not be
appointed until the board is seated, it seems that item is either an
impossible schedule or assumes facts not in evidence.
Joel M. Halpern
Ietf mailing list