-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Harald" == Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
writes:
Harald> My take (which is obviously biased) is that the number of
Harald> NAT devices 2 years from now is likely to be significantly
Harald> larger than the number of NAT devices currently deployed.
Yes, I agree.
And multiple layers too. And at higher speed points in the network.
Harald> And - here I am making a real leap of faith - if the IETF
Harald> recommendations for NAT devices make manufacturers who
Harald> listen to them create NAT devices that make their customers
Harald> more happy, then many of these new NAT devices may be
Harald> conformant to IETF recommendations.
Do we really want customers of NAT devices to be happy?
Harald> (Note - I sympathize with Pekka's touching faith in Teredo
Harald> as the Big Solution.... I hope he's right. So the NAT
Harald> recommendations may in that case boil down to a single
Harald> sentence:
Harald> "Don't break Teredo"
Harald> If that's the case.... it's worth saying.)
I don't think we need a working group to say this.
I think that the IAB could write a document much easier that said
that.
- --
] "Elmo went to the wrong fundraiser" - The Simpson | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr(_at_)xelerance(_dot_)com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/
|device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBQU8juoqHRg3pndX9AQGf5QQAmosDzc+v6l5dhfmedxwaikVvmFhe6/eE
LR/Re6jZ5NTjv6r51ea51bN8WOndaWp6zskwXLf+dKKfk0Ymqez7KN42nwmta0Qi
2eow3xUbzsse4zAXYH2Op7HLHJEZS4SQ16M92TBxay9hvoYj6mKnkxOp5DdbMXeQ
RhFiISfLMIg=
=NZkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf